Shane Jones

A fantasy from Trotter?

Chris Trotter has written on Bowalley Road (hence the link) an interesting premise come 2014.

John Key, the National Party’s moderate but unpopular leader, faces the near impossible task of creating a government out of an election result from which no clear majority is readily discernible – for either the Right or the Left.

The Governor-General asks Mr Key, as leader of by far the largest party, to try and form a government. Day after day drifts by without any sign of a breakthrough. All eyes turn to the leader of the Labour Party. Can David Shearer succeed where Mr Key is failing?

While Mr Key contemplates the election’s intractable political arithmetic, Mr Shearer begins pressuring the Green Party. He needs to know how badly their leaders want to be Cabinet Ministers. Is it possible that, for the sake of the country, they might step aside and allow Mr Peters and his NZ First colleagues to form a minority government with Labour? And would they then be willing to keep that government in office by voting it Confidence and Supply? When the Greens protest, Mr Shearer warns them that any refusal to step aside will almost certainly see Mr Peters pledge NZ First’s votes to Mr Key.

The Greens are in a quandary. As the third largest party in the new parliament, they should be in the box seat – but they’re not. On the contrary, pressures are mounting for them to be written out of the political play entirely.  Read more »

On Nathan Guy’s lies

A commenter objects to my characterisation of Nathan Guy

I must protest Whaleoil!

My main home is at Waikanae Beach on the Kapiti Coast and Nathan Guy is my MP, I have met him several times over the years and can attest he is a good and true man.Your claim he is a liar is very offensive to all of us who vote for Mr Guy.

Any sort of water project of this nature requires government involvement and is hardly socialism.

This commenter may have a point about Nathan being the kind of bovine intellect that appeals to voters in provincial New Zealand, but this doesn’t mitigate the fact he lied in his press release.  Read more »

Why is Nathan Guy Lying?

Agriculture spokesman dressed up as some form of Minister for Primary Industries, Nathan Guy has continued in the path of David Carter and is lying about water.

Today Nathan Guy berates Labour for changing their policy on water storage. Maybe it has never managed to penetrate through Nathan’s monobrow or to the manor born outlook on life but Labour have never agreed to piss away money on bludging farmers. They have never had a policy on supporting a specific project, let alone National’s sop to bludging farmers, the $500m irrigation fund. This lack of insight means Nathan comes up with a particularly moronic statement.

Minister for Primary Industries Nathan Guy says he is shocked at the Labour Party’s u-turn on supporting the Ruataniwha water storage scheme in Hawke’s Bay, despite previously indicating their support.  Read more »

Shane Jones declares war on NZ business

Labour’s Associate Finance spokesman has declared war on the employers of New Zealand.

In what is a return to Labour’s nasty vindictive roots, Shane Jones says Labour will never have a constructive relationship with Business New Zealand, the Auckland Chamber of Commerce, or any of the other large employers calling on Labour to reverse their plans for economic sabotage masquerading as power policy.

Because they disagree with Labour – they’re now the enemy.  Read more »

Shearer on Gilmore

I thought Shearer’s comments were a bit rich.

Labour leader David Shearer said John Key failed to show leadership by not calling Gilmore to get an explanation.

“The prime minister has just left it alone. He’ll pick up the phone to talk to somebody to get him a job in GCSB but he won’t pick up the phone to actually talk to his own MP. I find that extraordinary,” Shearer said, referring to Key’s call to old family friend Ian Fletcher over the top job at the Government Communications Security Bureau.  Read more »

Green/Labour Love

After announcing their plans for economic sabotage masquerading as power policy, the beltway started chattering about how the supposed Green/Labour alternative can work together.

Don’t tell Shane Jones.

Just look at the body language of Shane Jones. He actually loathes the little Green twerp Gareth Hughes.

It will be interesting to see a Green/Labour government unfold, just for pure giggles.

The country might not like what they get though.

Is this from the same David Parker?

David Parker was front and centre yesterday launching the Labour/Green economic assault on power generation.

“National is hurling all sorts of inaccurate insults at the NZ Power policy and muddying the waters. Their scaremongering shows they’re worried that hard-working New Zealanders who are sick of paying through the nose for electricity will embrace our new policy.

“Labour’s policy is quite clear. It will reduce power prices through two means.

“First, the single buyer NZ Power will buy electricity from generators on behalf of all New Zealanders at a fair price, based on their actual production costs and return on capital. It will not allow the companies the super profits from older hydro generation they get currently.

“Second, NZ Power will sell that wholesale power to retailers. As generators will be structurally separated from their retail business there will a level playing field and barriers to entry will be lowered. This will increase retail competition and lead to lower prices.

He was the go to man for comments yesterday, but I wonder of it is the same David Parker who, in a report to cabinet in 2006  said this:

“a single buyer would likely result in higher capital and operating costs”. He went on to say that: “The risks involved in changing arrangements could be significant. The resulting uncertainty could lead to investment proposals being put on hold. Direct implementation costs could be large.” And, he admitted that “The single buyer would be relatively poor at sustaining pressure on operational costs.”  Read more »

Was the note fake?

The Shane Jones/Bill Liu saga just will not die. Now there are suggestions that the file note written by Shane Jones may well have been fabricated.

National MPs have attempted to cast doubt on the validity of a key note used in Shane Jones’ decision to grant citizenship to Yang Liu when Jones was a Associate Immigration Minister.

This morning Deputy Auditor General Phillippa Smith appeared before the finance and expenditure select committee, taking questions over her report into Jones’ controversial 2008 decision.

His decision to grant citizenship to Liu, a Chinese national who was under the scrutiny of Interpol, was made despite an active police investigation being underway and the Department of Internal Affairs telling him not to.

It was Jones’ first and only decision to grant an individual citizenship, and was made in less than a month because he wanted to complete the matter before a trip to Australia.  Read more »

Sunday General Debate

Good morning and welcome to the Sunday General Debate. Plenty happened this week in NZ and around the world: a new Pope was elected, the Warriors lost….again, Shane Jones gets to sit a bit closer to Shearer, and it’s still not raining. The Gay Marriage Bill passed its second reading, and the Falkland Islanders gave the Argies the big finger.

 

Pope Francis celebrates by doing Gangnam Style.

Trotter on the Shame Jones affair

Chris Trotter echoes my thoughts on the Shane Jones affair:

Here’s a question for Labour. When confronted with evidence raising serious questions about the judgment of a senior caucus member, what should the leader do?

Should he measure the member’s actions against his own beliefs about what constitutes right and proper conduct in someone holding a ministerial warrant? Examining the facts of the case, should he ask himself how he would have acted differently? Should he take moral stock of the environment in which the member’s actions occurred? Paying special attention to the actions of the member’s staff, should he ask himself whether he would have felt comfortable working alongside them? Would he have trusted their advice?

Or, should he simply outsource the whole job to the auditor-general?

As we know Shearer sent requested the A-G look at this issue. Perhaps because he lacked the courage to deal with it internally.  Read more »