The media and opposition appear to have fallen for the standard civil liberties play.
Here is how it goes.
Any reduction of civil liberties will be met by strong opposition. ¬†That’s a given. ¬† So, if you want to achieve something, make sure you actually make it sound worse.
After some time, “you’ve listened to the people of New Zealand”, and you withdraw the most contentious issue.
The civil liberty campaigners will see it as a victory, and… voila! ¬†What you really wanted through … is through.
A classic master class in this was the introduction of “ID card”¬†driving licenses. ¬† At the time, they pushed the idea it would become a “national identity card”, and “mandatory photo ID”.
Cue¬†the civil liberty campaigners… ¬† after “listening”, the government stepped away from pushing it as far as they originally proposed, and… voila! ¬† They achieved a photo-id database that was unprecedented at the time. ¬†Not even passports were that “digitised” at the time.
Incidentally, all these civil liberties people were Missing In Action when all my private data was being intercepted and passed around without a search warrant – but I digress…
With that strategy of deliberately overexciting the numpties with a fake bit of policy in mind, I’ve been observing the current outcry about the “Terror” Bill. ¬† The most contentious of it appears to be the 48 hours of surveillance without a search warrant. Read more »