Sky TV

The beginning of the end for Sky TV

The geniuses at Sky TV decided to blame Cricket South Africa for their failure to deliver for fans. 

That has backfired somewhat as Cricket South Africa cuts their throat by delivering up the cricket for free via live streaming.

Black Caps fans will be able to watch the two remaining one day matches against South Africa online for free after Sky TV failed to reach a broadcast deal.

Sky Television was criticised for failing to screen the first one day game in the series earlier this week, reportedly saying Cricket South Africa set too steep a price for the Black Caps’ games.

But in a statement released this evening, Cricket South Africa (CSA) chief executive Haroon Lorgat said media reports “failed to accurately report the state of affairs”.

CSA has now announced that it will stream the games online live, and it will be free of charge to fans living in New Zealand only.

The live streaming will be hosted on CSA’s website:   Read more »

The biggest loser: Sky TV


The Black Caps are just as unhappy as their fan base that Sky TV hasn’t secured the rights for their tour of South Africa.

Batting coach Craig McMillan said New Zealand Cricket is extremely disappointed and the players, even more so. Read more »

Might is Right (how the big companies killed Global Mode)

The “Global Mode” case has been settled in favour of the big media companies.

A notice posted this morning to the NZX by Sky TV reads, in full: “The legal proceedings against “Global Mode” service providers have been settled. As a result, from 1 September 2015, the “Global Mode” service will not be available to any person for use in New Zealand.” [See expanded statement by Sky TV to media end of article.]

In return for CallPlus dropping its service, the media companies have dropped their case.

Sky TV, TVNZ, MediaWorks and Lightbox owner Spark brought a High Court Action against the CallPlus (owner of Orcon and Slingshot) over their Global Mode service, available to all customers of its ISP services, which made it easier to access BBC iPlayer, Netflix US and other offshore content services usually geo-blocked to New Zealanders. The action also covered Bypass Network Services Ltd (BNSL), the tiny Auckland company that developed the Global Mode technology used by Orcon and Slingshot (plus a half-dozen smaller ISPs who threw in the towel as soon as the legal action was brought).

The big media companies claimed the service breached the Copyright Act and the Fair Trading Act.

I really felt there was a solid argument to be had about parallel importing, but I can understand why a relative minnow like CallPlus does not have the financial resources to take on companies that spend the same amount on office expenses every week. Read more »


Please tell me why I should stay with Sky


So can anyone give me a single reason why I should still have a Sky account?

Don’t say sport, I can stream whatever I want…plus there are multiple sports channels with far more sport than most could consume available on multiple systems including Apple TV, Amazon Fire TV (I have both) plus other systems. ESPN boxing and MMA coverage is superb, plus other sports that are never aired on NZ television, without paying extortionate fees to Sky TV for channels I barely watch.

Don’t say Movies, I can get whatever I want through Netflix, Hulu, HBO and a myriad of other services that in total don’t add up to the cost of even Sky Basic.   Read more »

Copyright versus Parallel Importing

Why would Sky or TVNZ be in control of where you are allowed to go on the Internet?  If you want to pay to access a streaming service in another country to get content that TVNZ (say) have local broadcasting rights to, why should you be stopped?

And if there is a company that helps you do this a little easier, are they assisting your parallel import or assisting you to breaching copyright?

Four New Zealand media companies recently joined forces to flex their collective muscles against Call Plus-owned media companies Orcon, Slingshot and Bypass Network services.

The ”Big Four” claim the companies are breaching copyright and operating outside the law by providing customers access to otherwise blocked international TV and movie services.

The companies have threatened legal action by way of ”cease and desist” letters sent to the alleged copyright infringers, who at this stage appear to be standing firm on the legality of their unblocking services. Read more »

You can watch Sky TV…. slide into obscurity

Is Sky TV unable or unwilling to rise to the challenges before it?

As everyone in the real world is abundantly aware, television and the way we consume it, is changing. There is an enormous shift to online and those that fail to embrace it will be destined to the history books.

This week, Sky announced a 12.7 percent increase in net profit of $92.5 million in the six months to December 31. Revenue from subscribers was up 3% with overall revenue up 1.8%.

But that’s about where the good news ends. The NBR’s Chris Keall has astutely described Sky’s revenue as “golden handcuffs”.

8,707 subscribers ditched the pay tv service resulting in a household penetration dip from 48.7% of the population to 48.3%. Churn rose from 13.2% to 13.7%.

While admitting that the industry is in transition to online, Sky CEO John Fellet seems entirely naive about how to do so. Having helmed the company through many years as a dominant monopolistic force, Fellet seems ill-equiped to steer the company through the obstacle course created by disruptive technologies. Read more »


What are Sky not telling their shareholders?


Sky Network Television Limited looks like a pretty solid investment.  They seem to have an unassailable position in the market.  Where else do you go for your live NRL, IPL, various World Cups and All Blacks?

Throng reports

The FIFA World Cup began this morning and like practically every other sporting event, Sky has the monopoly on it. Sport is possibly the most compelling reason why anyone would become a Sky subscriber and while a lot of content can be sourced from elsewhere, it is sport that gifts Sky its dominant position. That is, up until now. Read more »

Sky Basic going up. Again. Angry? Maybe you can help


The basic package price is about to increase again for Sky Subscribers. The New Zealand Herald has asked me to find a Sky subscriber who isn’t happy about this and would like to make a comment for tomorrow’s paper. If you’d like to let your feelings be known, please contact me ASAP.

Living wage includes allowance for Sky TV

Beauty and Style blogger David Farrar stumbles into a political story, exposing the base assumptions that make up the “Living Wage” claim.

Brian Scott has published a critique of the so called Living Wage, and it should be compulsory reading for any politician that has treated the calculations done by Rev Waldegrave as a fit basis for public policy decisions. It is quite legitimate to have a view that wages should be higher, but to insist that the correct level is that calculated by Rev Waldegrave is a surrender to symbolism over substance.

The key findings by Scott are:

  1. Only 12% of low income households are two adults and two dependents, which the Waldegrave calculation is based on
  2. They assume you need 10 hours of childcare a week, even if the children are aged over 14
  3. They calculation of level of “basic necessities” is not based on any empirical measurement of the lowest cost of necessities, but merely a proportion of the average expenditure in deciles 1 to 5 (this one is key – it is a calculation based on the Browns should be spending as much as the Jones, and is not a caculation on how much income the Browns need)
  4. The calculation doesn’t account for some sources of household income such as trade-ins, sales, teenagers income (yet does include their costs) and school donation tax refunds
  5. The calculation double counts some expenditure such as childcare costs   Read more »

Pimping the poor on TVNZ

The Mataitonga watching TV

The Mataitonga family  watching TV

Last night TVNZ ran a Labour party fed story about power prices.

Tens of thousands of Kiwis on pre-pay electricity plans are being charged up to 60% more than those on ordinary plans, figures obtained by ONE News reveal.

Really…obtained by ONE News…more like obtained by Labour and given to ONE News…here is Labour’s press release (timed at 14:12)

Power companies are unfairly targeting the poorest New Zealanders by charging them the highest electricity rates, Labour’s Energy spokesperson David Shearer says.

New figures obtained by Labour show those on pre-pay electricity plans – paying electricity bills in advance – pay up to 60 per cent more than those paying a regular power bill.

Amazing coincidence that TVNZ seems to have obtained the same figures and miraculously run a story that played some 4 hours after Labour issued a press release.

The figures have prompted calls for greater regulation of power prices.

“It’s grossly unfair that these people, the poorest people in our society who have no choices, should be stung by our power companies in the search for more profit,” says Labour’s energy spokesperson David Shearer.  Read more »