Matthew Hooton points out the obvious…that Andrew Little has sided himself and Labour with head-hacking terrorists.
As Mr Minto and his comrades argued at the time, it would not do to claim apartheid-era South Africa was a long way away, that what happened there didnâ€™t affect us and that it would be dangerous to put oneself in harmâ€™s way against the Red Squad.Â They argued that to go to a game was to tacitly support the South African regime even if one claimed to oppose apartheid.Â For those young enough, fit enough and brave enough (like Mr Minto and Murray McCully, now John Keyâ€™s foreign minister) it was seen as an important withdrawal of consent to be bloodied by Ross Meurantâ€™s PR24s.
For his efforts, Mr Minto was labelled a â€śprincipled fanaticâ€ť by the SIS. With his background as a bland, middle-of-the-road union bureaucrat, no one will ever use that noun to describe Andrew Little. And now, after his despicable conduct over the training mission to Iraq, no one will ever use the adjective to describe him either.
Under Mr Mintoâ€™s formula, it is not enough for the Labour leader to say ISIS is evil but a long way away, nothing to do with us and too dangerous to oppose anyway.Â His failure to support even the minimal contribution Mr Key has authorised â€“ falling well short of what the Iraqi government sought â€“ is to tacitly support religious barbarians so extreme that even Al-Qaeda has distanced itself from them.Â Were he a Michael Joseph Savage, a Peter Fraser or even a Helen Clark, instead of bleating that Mr Keyâ€™s decision might put New Zealanders at risk, he would instead be attacking the prime ministerâ€™s minimalist response as cowardice.
Mr Little had a choice to stand beside Mr Key or Mohammed Emwazi, Jihadi John.Â He chose the latter.
There is nothing worse than celebrities going out and doing something then pathetically apologising for their actions after some whiners and whingers arc up on social media.
Glenn McGrath is the latest no-dick to apologise after shooting a game animal in Africa. Worse still it happened in 2008…but that hasn’t stopped the whingers.
Former Australian test cricketer Glenn McGrath has said he deeply regrets shooting African animals â€“ despite speaking about wanting to do so two years before.
He is facing a wave of angry criticism after pictures showing him with dead African wildlife began circulating online.
The photographs of McGrath, who is known to enjoy hunting, can be found by searching Chipitani Safaris, a game park in South Africa, but appear to have been removed from the website.
They show the former fast bowler crouched beside what looks like a dead buffalo, two hyenas and posing with the tusks of an elephant. Â Read more »
Yesterday was the anniversary of Winston Churchill’s death. He is a historical figure that I admire because he symbolises to me the determination and tenacity of the underdog. Britain was not winning the war when he became Prime Minister and he had to deal with defeat and failure but he never gave up. His speeches are still quoted today because of the way he used the spoken word to inspire and to energise the British people. One line from one of his speeches is as relevant today for the UK as it was back in 1940.
You ask, what is our aim? I can answer in one word: It is victory, victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory, there is no survival.
It looks like, contrary to the alarmists views, that global warming is actually helping wheat production, not hindering it.
Global wheat production set new records in 2013 and 2014, contradicting alarmistsâ€™ claims that global warming is reducing wheat harvests.
Global warming alarmists and their lapdog media allies decided Christmas Week 2014 should be filled with claims that global warming is crushing wheat production. Grist, Reuters, the UKGuardian, and the Columbus Dispatch are among the many news organizations parroting alarmist assertions that global warming is reducing wheat harvests. The Reuters article, for example, cites a study co-authored by several global warming alarmists to claim, â€śIn recent decades, wheat yields had declined in hotter sites such as India, Africa, Brazil and Australia, more than offsetting yield gains in some cooler places including parts of the United States, Europe and China.â€ť
Reuters did not indicate whether it had fact-checked the straightforward claim that global crop yields have been declining in recent decades. Reuters also failed to provide any countering viewpoint, giving readers the impression that declining global wheat yields are universally recognized. Knowing, however, that global warming alarmists and their ventriloquist dummies in the media often make straightforward factual claims that are proven false by objective, verifiable data, I decided to fact-check their straightforward claim about declining global wheat yields.
Not only are global wheat yields not declining, they are rising at a spectacular pace. According to objective U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) data, global wheat yields have risen by 33 percent since 1994. Moreover, there has been a 4 percent increase in areas harvested for wheat, indicating increased atmospheric carbon dioxide, improved soil moisture, and global warming are making more lands suitable for wheat harvests. Cumulatively, the 33 percent increase in wheat yield per acre and the 4 percent increase in land harvested for wheat add up to a near 40 percent increase in the global wheat harvest since 1994.
The spectacular gains in wheat yields show no signs of slowing down as the Earth continues its modest warming. The year 2014 saw the highest global wheat yield in history, exceeding the 2013 yield that had also set a new record.
Looking a little closer at wheat production data, the alarmistsâ€™ propensity for telling lies extends far beyond lies about global wheat production. It turns out the alarmists and their media allies are also telling lies about wheat production in the very nations and continents they claim are experiencing wheat production declines â€” India, Africa, Brazil and Australia.
Alarmist lie? Well I never. Same with media…who would have ever thought it?
Letâ€™s start by looking at Africa. Egypt is the only African nation that cracks the global top 20 in wheat production. In Egypt, wheat output has quadrupled during the past three decades, with the past 10 years producing the 10 highest wheat crops in Egyptian history. This is quite a contradiction to Reutersâ€™ claim that â€śIn recent decades, wheat yields had declined in hotter sites such as India, Africa, Brazil and Australiaâ€¦.â€ť
And itâ€™s not just Egypt, either. Africaâ€™s second largest wheat producer, Morocco, produced its largest wheat crop in history in 2013.
On the other side of the African continent, South Africa alsoproduced record wheat yields in 2014, continuing a trend of rising South African wheat yields that extends back to the 1980s. Taking advantage of rapidly rising wheat yields, South Africans have been able to cut the area cultivated for wheat production to merely one-third of 1980s levels while still maintaining steady total wheat production. This has enabled South Africans to produce additional crops on former wheat farms and return much of the cropland to its natural condition for Africaâ€™s iconic wildlife.
One of New Zealand’s most secretive military organisations has opened its high-security doors for a 93-year-old woman.
Tonight, it was a meeting of war heroes when New Zealand’s Victoria Cross winner Willie Apiata kissed 93-year-old Pippa Doyle, one of the great if unknown secret agents of World War II.
Apiata was in the audience as Pippa â€“ otherwise known as Phyllis Latour Doyle â€“ received France’s highest decoration: the Chevalier de l’Ordre National de la Legion d’Honneur, the Legion of Honour (knight class).
A former North Shore woman charged with kidnapping her daughter has been extradited to America.
She is face of the day because after reading the article I realised one thing. I am sexist. Because she was the mother of the baby I immediately assumed she must have had a good reason to do what she did but in fact no such evidence was mentioned in the article. I then asked myself how would I have reacted if it was the Father who had done it? I realised that I would have been furious that he denied the Mother the right to be in her daughter’s life for 20 years. Not only that but she would have had 20 years of heart ache not knowing where her daughter was or if she was safe. I then realised what a horrendous thing it was.
I also have seen the horrible things parents have done to each other after a break up. I have seen them use their children to hurt the other parent. What if this was the ultimate punishment that Dorothy doled out to her husband, the pain of never being a part of his daughters life?
Judge Thokozile Matilda Masipa
The World Awaits Her Verdict
Oscar Pistorius murder trial: The woman who already knows if the Paralympian is guilty â€“ or not guilty Read more »
A bunch of squeamish limp-dicked wowsers are happening scorn on Crusader rugby players because they dared to enjoy a spot of hunting…legally, shooting legal game animals, with legal permits, and legal guides.
If these blokes stepped out of the bush in New Zealand with a 12 pointer Red stag, a massive Captain Cooker and few goats to feed the dogs wearing nothing but boots, shorts and a swannie then we’d be calling them good keen blokes.
Pictures of Crusaders rugby players on a hunting trip in South Africa are being used by an environmental organisation in its fight against what it calls canned, or joyride, hunting.
The players shown in the four pictures posted by the Landmark Foundation on its Facebook page were Tom Taylor, George and Sam Whitelock, Ben Funnell and Tyler Bleyendaal. In each picture, one or more of the players was posing beside a dead animal. The animals were a zebra, a blesbok, a gemsbok and an eland.
Foundation director Dr Bool Smuts said none of the animals involved were endangered and he expected the hunting was legal.
But his foundation was “against the whole concept of trophy hunting”.
“If it was a biological intervention on a professional basis … for management of species and biodiversity we can understand that,” Smuts said.
“When these people (hunters) come out they want to hunt the thing with the biggest horns, the most dominant males usually because they are the good trophies, so the natural selection is not natural at all.”
I have been telling anyone who would listen, both on this site and in speeches that other businesses will be the next target for plain packing after the health nazis have finished destroying tobacco.
Some just shake their heads and say that it will never happen to their industry, others acknowledge it but think that their blond media trained bimbos sitting outside the CEOs office will be able to bat off the massed forces of state funded troughers presenting their “evidence” to bewildered and easily confused politicians.
They are wrong, and the pain isn’t far off, particularly for the food and beverage industry.
Some are waking up though.
Lawyers for confectioner Mars have warned that plain packaging for tobacco could have a major impact on other products to theÂ detriment of consumers, according betterRetailing.
Should the government proceed with plans to introduce plain packaging, it could lead to brand names being put into plain type, as well as certain colours and shapes being removed from product packaging.
Mars argued that these types of branding helped consumers to identify quality products, which had a lesser risk of being counterfeited. Mars would certainly be vulnerable to such regulations, with ownership of Dolmio and Uncle Ben’s, as well as its chocolate and petcare products. Â Â Read more »