Stuart Nash

Professional Jealousy?

Dominion Post

It looks Tracy Watkins is a bit miffed that people talked to me and not to her…

The latest leak, over outgoing chief of staff Stuart Nash’s abrupt departure from Wellington on Thursday, should be what causes Mr Shearer the most sleepless nights. It appeared on right-wing blog Whale Oil within hours of Mr Nash’s departure.

Fairfax had found out purely by chance only an hour or so earlier. The leak to Whale Oil was more deliberate, and according to people in the know, could only have come from either a very tight circle of senior staffers, or one or two very highly placed MPs.

The implications are all bad for Labour. Whale Oil’s Cameron Slater is almost single-mindedly bent on undermining and destabilising the left-wing of politics.

He regularly runs half-baked conspiracy theories and innuendo up the flagpole just to see if he can get the mainstream media running. Why anyone within Labour would give him credence is mystifying.

Interesting, so leaking to her (by mistake)… is better than leaking to me…deliberately?

It is true that I am single-mindedly bent on undermining and destabilizing the left-wing of politics. So Bloody What…at least I am honest about it, unlike the media fan-bois who pretend to be impartial but are far from it.

Those paragraphs just show the professional jealously that an Auckland based blogger, not inside the beltway or even the gallery can gazzump and ruin her story for the next day. Boo hoo, dry your eyes Tracy.

Another leak designed to destroy

Dominion Post

The Labour party is in turmoil with leaks and counter leaks. One thing is clear the leaks that are being run now are designed to neutralise David Shearers support. Tracy Watkins obviously doesn’t have the stones to name me like the NZ Herald does. As the Labour civil war gathers momentum the tipline is humming:

The Labour leader’s office appears to be in turmoil after David Shearer’s chief of staff abruptly left Wellington.

Former Labour MP Stuart Nash, who has been in the job just a few months, was seen leaving Parliament yesterday after a meeting with Mr Shearer’s incoming chief of staff Alistair Cameron. He later confirmed that he would be working on projects from his home in Napier for the next couple of weeks. He is due to finish on May 31.

Mr Nash rejected suggestions he had been “frogmarched” out of the building or given orders to clear his desk but his abrupt departure coincides with rising conflict in the Labour Party over Mr Shearer’s continued poor polling and lack of a clear strategy.

Some of that conflict has been laid bare in leaks to a Right-wing blog that could only have come from either senior MPs or highly placed members of the leadership team.

There is definitely a whispering campaign going on. I certainly heard about Stuart Nash’s departure before he did, and it wasn’t from Wellington beltway sources.

Mr Nash’s departure will only fuel speculation over the ambitions of his deputy, Grant Robertson, who has been forced to deny interest in the leadership after some key appoinments were filled by Robertson allies.

Mr Cameron, a Wellington-based lawyer and Aids Foundation Trust chairman, is a former adviser to Labour MP Marian Hobbs, in whose office Mr Robertson also worked. Another appointment seen as “Robertson-friendly” included his former Wellington Central campaign manager Patrick Leyland and there are suggestions Jordan Carter is poised to replace Chris Flatt as party secretary.

The Labour luvvies are gossiping and the Auckland ones are squawking nicely. The gay grapevine is way quicker than the political pigeons in getting news out.

Nash given the boot in favour of Deputy Leader’s man.

The NZ Herald

A member of the Whale army has emailed me to say that she overhead a Labour staffer bragging that Nash was telling people on Monday that he would be in Wellington “for another few months”, despite the fact that I had already picked who his replacement was going to be. The next day though he was given the boot and told to clear his desk.

Gossips in Wellington are saying that Nash has the pip and is driving back to Hawke’s Bay this afternoon.  Perhaps someone in the Gallery could get off their arse and check Nash’s (old) office?

This morning the Herald reported:

Labour leader David Shearer has appointed lawyer and NZ Aids Foundation chairman Alastair Cameron as his new chief of staff after the resignation of Stuart Nash.

I call time on David Shearer’s leadership of Labour.

As Brash found out with his ACT/Stu Wilson clusterfuck appointment, a chief of staff is the one person that must be unquestionably loyal.  The COS should be person the Leader should never have to doubt.  The leader relies on the COS to keep an ear to the ground and act in the leader’s interests even if that means the Leader is deliberately inoculated from matters he/she is best not even knowing about.

Heather Simpson, Richard Long, Wayne Eagleson would die in the ditch for their boss.  The question is – who is Alastair Cameron’s boss?

The current leader of the Labour Party, or the next?

Is there a Labour Civil war?

Labour and the leftwing lap-bloggers thought there was a civil war on inside National. There wasn’t because if there was I’d have been right in the middle of it spilling blood and guts all over the place.

However it is becoming clearer and clearer that there is a factional war going on inside Labour.

They are leaking like a sieve with reports of arguments, dummy spitting, and factional number counting.

Grant Robertson has been in charge of the hiring for the Leader’s Office and has largely finished his job in filling the office with loyal adherents to himself. He was even heard to boast to staffers the day after he was made Deputy Leader that everything was brilliant…”Shearer is going to stuff it up…and I will be the next leader and Prime Minister”.

The last piece of the puzzle appears to be falling into place with Stuart Nash’s expected replacement to be Alistair Cameron, a Robertson loyalist.

That has got open discussion happening now on Labour supporting blogs that Shearer’s time is up. The word from various Labour spies is they have taken to calling the Shearer leadership “The Unfortunate Experiment“. This is a particularly nasty epitet to give David Shearer but sadly that is modern Labour…nasty to the core. David Shearer unfortunately didn’t fit that mold.

Veteran Labour party watcher and somewhat of a fan-boi, Vernon Small has noticed:

Consensus, he said, was his first instinct.

It is a style Mr Shearer is making his brand; a reasonable man talking in a measured tone that rejects the politics of charisma.

To the political media present – and in a warning to Labour, only three reporters made the short hop from Wellington – it was about as dull as a leader’s speech can get.

With the Government on the ropes over issues from the pokies deal with SkyCity to Crafar farm sales and asset sales, the soft-shoe approach is not without its critics.

There is no crisis yet, but there has been some internal arm-wrestling.

Small repeats the gossip fo the nasties suggesting that Nash and Fran Mold clashed over strategy…this adds to the leaking of his leaving suggesting that all is not well as the factions start eyeing each other up across the political corpse of David Shearer.

It is notable too that the lap-bloggers at The Standard are now openly talking of the ending of “The Unfortunate Experiment“:

My suspicion is that within the very near future, maybe after another flat poll, someone close to Shearer, perhaps Trevor, will have a hard conversation with him that goes something like “you’ve done your best mate but it’s just not worked” and I think that Shearer will step down because he’s the kind of guy that would step down if he believed it was the best thing to do.

This is insider code for if you don;t go soon Shearer, Trev will be sent to plunge the knife in.

It is clear that the strategy from Mallard and others was to push Shearer forward on silly issues so that he was able to be easily blamed when the polls failed to turn.Meanwhile to hide the internal ructions in labour Trevor Mallard manufactured an alleged crisis within national that simply didn’t exist which a compliant media dutifully ran with. It is telling that the ones pushing the story the hardest are also the one seen int he company of Trevor Mallard more often than not.

Unfortunately the end of Shearer’s time as leader is no longer an ‘if’ question, rather it has become a ‘when’ question. I’d suggest it will be fore Labour Weekend now.

Will Shearer last till Labour Weekend?

NZ Herald

With Stuart Nash departing as Chief of Staff David Shearer is now left exposed to the underhand machinations of Trevor Mallard, the puppet master of Labour. It was telling that despite continued SMOGs and faux pas like his ticket scalping episode that he went completely un-challenged or even remotely disciplined. Even after falsely accusing and defaming people in parliament and then defaming a minister outside of it Labour continues to give Mallard a free reign. For some reason they think he is a strategic genius, forgetting his utterly inept performance as campaign strategist in the 2011 General Election.

You now have to question whether or not David Shearer can make it through as leader to Labour Weekend, which this year is October 22. Grant Robertson, with Mallard as his numbers man must be feeling pretty confident right now…Labour weekend for Shearer seems a long, long way away…can he make it?

James Elliot in the Herald on Sunday doesn’t seem to think so:

Which brings us back to the living or, rather, also the living dead in the form of Labour leader David Shearer.

To be honest, I felt obliged to toe tag him with the title Labour leader just to help identify him.

He seems to be the least visible figure on the national political scene.

So it was hardly a good idea for him to radically alter his appearance by shaving his head for charity. He needs to be reminded that charity begins at home but right now he looks homeless and everything else-less.

It’s as if he should be on a missing person’s list, reportedly last seen somewhere in Central Wellington with bank accounts and political capital untouched. Maybe he will be added to the drowning statistics, pulled under by one of the many undercurrents swirling around in the Labour caucus. Or maybe he could just be asleep at the wheel, in which case suddenly veering to the right will likely be fatal.

Whichever way it goes you do get the feeling that unless there’s some kind of second coming he could become just another public holiday statistic.

One wonders what odds the TAB would offer on him surviving to the aptly named Labour Weekend.

Shearer Gets Something Right

 NZ Herald

The NZ Herald editorial shows that perhaps David Shearer gat least got something right:

Mr Shearer’s speech suggested many of the lessons of Labour’s humiliating defeat last year have been learned. There will be a concerted attempt to regain the central territory once occupied so adroitly by Helen Clark. In that context, what was not in Mr Shearer’s address was as important as its focus.

Not once, for example, were the words “trade union” uttered. Neither did the National Party rate a mention.

Trade Unions cost Labour a lot of votes. They put up dud candidates who can’t win votes, often whom let National MPs increase their majority. They manipulate the list so good MPs like Stuart Nash and Kelvin Davis are out of parliament while proven vote losers and people who help brand Labour the Nasty Party like Fenton and Moroney stay in.

Shearer needs to get rid of the union dominance of Labour if he wants to be Prime Minister. His not mentioning unions in his first speech of the year was a great start.

As predicted

As predicted the Herald’s Labour Fan-girl, Claire Trevett, has swallowed Grant Robertsons breathless “release” of documents posted 3 months ago on lap-blog The Standard.

Labour is going back to the Electoral Commission about John Key’s pre-election RadioLive show, saying the Prime Minister was more involved in it than he let on.

Labour’s deputy leader, Grant Robertson, yesterday released emails showing Mr Key had chosen and approached his own guests and his office had changed a “brief” about the show and provided the wording for RadioLive to request advice from the Electoral Commission about it.

In the emails Mr Key’s communications manager, Willy Trolove, also wrote that Electoral Commission advice had not given a definitive go-ahead for the show, but made it clear the responsibility was on the broadcaster, “which is useful”.

Mr Robertson said the emails showed Mr Key’s office was clearly nervous about a possible rule breach.

No…what the emails show is that Labour’s leaders office is still very closely linked to The Standard and they are now running stories seeded first on The Standard then feeding them to a pliable and believing media fan-club.

Mike Smith also ran a follow up post on the re-heat last night.

Is David Shearer prepared to deny the link between their lap-bloggers The Standard and the leader’s office categorically? Is chief of staff Stuart Nash?

Challenge in Hutt South?

After the tweet from Trevor Mallard:

@ @ I'm old fashioned but idea of staff censoring MPs doesn't fit well. We make mistakes, but we own them not staff
@TrevorMallard
Trevor Mallard

Perhaps Stuart Nash is eyeing Hutt South? 

 ” I’ve made it pretty clear to David that I have political ambitions and that I’m still keen to be an MP and he understands that.”  As for the next general election in 2014, Mr Nash said he was not sure what electorate he would represent. (Napier Mail Jan 31, 2012)

One thing is for sure the Labour MPs seem to be ignoring instructions about using Red Alert in a more circumspect manner.

Random Impertinent Questions

Is it a coincidence that the Labour MP’s have SMOG’d all day on Red Alert, the first day of Stuart Nash’s employment?

Is this the MP’s way of saying you won’t touch our blog?

Is the following tweet as much about that than a post by Jake Quinn?

@ @ I'm old fashioned but idea of staff censoring MPs doesn't fit well. We make mistakes, but we own them not staff
@TrevorMallard
Trevor Mallard

Why was Trevor Mallard spending the Christmas break beavering away writing LGOIMA requests to the local council about correspondence regarding Paul Quinn’s election signs?

Hasn’t he got better things to do?

Is this really focussing on the things that matter?

Txts from New York

via the tipline: