Douglas Murray at ¬†The Spectator explains why it is a shameful lie to describe any religion, but in particular Islam as a “religion of peace”.
The West‚Äôs movement towards the truth is remarkably slow. We drag ourselves towards it painfully, inch by inch, after each bloody Islamist assault.
In France, Britain, Germany, America and nearly every other country in the world it remains government policy to say that any and all attacks carried out in the name of Mohammed have ‚Äėnothing to do with Islam‚Äô. It was said by George W. Bush after 9/11, Tony Blair after 7/7 and Tony Abbott after the Sydney attack last month. It is what David Cameron said after two British extremists cut off the head of Drummer Lee Rigby in London, when ‚ÄėJihadi John‚Äô cut off the head of aid worker Alan Henning in the ‚ÄėIslamic State‚Äô and when Islamic extremists attacked a Kenyan mall, separated the Muslims from the Christians and shot the latter in the head. And, of course, it is what President Fran√ßois Hollande said after the massacre of journalists and Jews in Paris last week.
All these leaders are wrong. In private, they and their senior advisers often concede that they are telling a lie. The most sympathetic explanation is that they are telling a ‚Äėnoble lie‚Äô, provoked by a fear that we ‚ÄĒ the general public ‚ÄĒ are a lynch mob in waiting. ‚ÄėNoble‚Äô or not, this lie is a mistake. First, because the general public do not rely on politicians for their information and can perfectly well read articles and books about Islam for themselves. Secondly, because the lie helps no one understand the threat we face. Thirdly, because it takes any heat off Muslims to deal with the bad traditions in their own religion. And fourthly, because unless mainstream politicians address these matters then one day perhaps the public will overtake their politicians to a truly alarming extent.
If politicians are so worried about this secondary ‚Äėbacklash‚Äô problem then they would do well to remind us not to blame the jihadists‚Äô actions on our peaceful compatriots and then deal with the primary problem ‚ÄĒ radical Islam ‚ÄĒ in order that no secondary, reactionary problem will ever grow.
We must confront radical Islam, otherwise it will grow.
Yet today our political class fuels both cause and nascent effect. Because the truth is there for all to see. To claim that people who punish people by killing them for blaspheming Islam while shouting ‚ÄėAllah is greatest‚Äô has ‚Äėnothing to do with Islam‚Äô is madness. Because the violence of the Islamists is, truthfully, only to do with Islam: the worst version of Islam, certainly, but Islam nonetheless.
Last week, a chink was broken in this wall of disinformation when Sajid Javid, the only Muslim-born member of the British cabinet, and one of its brightest hopes, dipped a toe into this water. After the Paris attacks, he told the BBC: ‚ÄėThe lazy answer would be to say that this has got nothing whatsoever to do with Islam or Muslims and that should be the end of that. That would be lazy and wrong.‚Äô Sadly, he proceeded to utter the second most lazy thing one can say: ‚ÄėThese people are using Islam, taking a peaceful religion and using it as a tool to carry out their activities.‚Äô
How many times have we heard this? …from Obama, to Cameron, to many other politicians.
It is a lie. ¬† Read more »