I haven’t passed comment on our now more than a year old moderation and commenting policies. I haven’t commented for a reason…there is no need to comment, I am happy with the results despite more than a few detractors who are now junking up other people’s sites.
But people have noticed, and here is one reader who has sent in his comments about the difference between comments on my site vs the mainstream media.
Yesterday¬†I read two articles on the same subject – Helen Clark and her ambition to lead the UN, one on Whale Oil the other on TV3’s site.
No surprises in the content of the articles, but it was the comments sections¬†which I though gave¬†a very¬†interesting insight on the whole perception of Whale¬†Oil versus MSM scenario.
Often Whale Oil is portrayed as the nasty attack Blog with the lowest (or no) standards and the MSM the defender of standards and arbitrators of what is right.
Here are¬† random shots of both sites comments section where I could include at least three commentators¬†who¬†responded to a different point of view¬†– the difference is stark.
I am betting If you¬†asked a non Whale Oil reader who has been subjected to the anti Whale Oil propaganda they would be extremely surprised at the result.
TV3 has it so wrong on so many fronts it doesn’t need pointing out – they should actually close comments on their site if they cannot keep them to a reasonable standard.
This is why Whale oil continues to fight and win the good fights. ¬† Read more »