And why aren’t hordes of women and leftie liberals not demanding his head?
And why aren’t hordes of women and leftie liberals not demanding his head?
It seems that the media and the lefty luvvies who were dead kent to hug a muslim had been sold a pup with the so-called #illridewithyou rubbish.
I had a discussion with someone on Thursday about this, and I was suspicious of the whole Twitter meme…likening it to #kony2012.
Slacktivism at its worst.
It seems I was right, with the woman credited with the originating story that lead to the creation of the hashtagÂ now confessing to lying about her encounter.
GAPS have appeared in the story that inspired the #illridewithyou Twitter phenomenon.
University lecturer [and former Greens candidate] Rachael Jacobs had originally posted a status on Facebook, explaining how she offered to protect a woman who felt uncomfortable wearing her hijab.
According to her story, Ms Jacobs had seen the woman beginning to remove her scarf, and ran after her, saying âPut it back on. Iâll walk with you.â
The exchange took place on a Brisbane train, while the Sydney siege was taking place in Sydneyâs Martin Place.
But did a “conversation” actually occur?
It seems not. The Brisbane Times reports a different story:
By sheer fluke, we got off at the same station, and some part of me decided saying something would be a good thing. Rather than quiz her about her choice of clothing, I thought if I simply offered to walk her to her destination, it might help.
It’s hard to describe the moment when humans, and complete strangers, have a conversation with no words. I wanted to tell her I was sorry for so many things â for overstepping the mark, for making assumptions about a complete stranger and for belonging to a culture where racism was part of her everyday experience.
But none of those words came out, and our near silent encounter was over in a moment.
A reader emails about Giovanni Tiso’s affectionate tweet about Josef Stalin.
â Giovanni Tiso (@gtiso) December 9, 2014
Thought you might be interested in this – something I saw a couple of weeks back on Twitter, but was waiting for a friend of mine to get back to me about before I fired it your way.
Basically, twitter’s self-appointed adjudicator of self-righteousness, Giovani Tiso, made a joke about referring to Stalin as “grandpa” in a thread about photos of politicians when they were younger.
I thought it was a little off colour joke to make given Stalin’s brutality, but to check I wasn’t being hypersensitive, I flicked it on to a friend of mine on Twitter whose family is Russian to see what he made of it and asked if he could jot down his reaction. I thought his reply hit the nail on the head:
“Its bloody disgusting to joke affectionately about Stalin being grandpa. Would Mr Tiso be happy if anyone else making a similar joke about Hitler, Pol Pot or some other genocidal maniac from the 20th century? He’d be the first to kick up a big stink about how inappropriate it was. Â Â Read more »
While Matt Nippert and David ‘Tainted’ Fisher are lapping up the adulation of the script kiddies in Wellington there is yet another article about the failure of journalistic ethics, where it appears that journalists are quite happy to rely on criminals to their reporting for them.
These so-called investigative journalists are even still in touch with the hacker of my emails (if tweets from the Kiwicon are accurate)…so much for their journalistic integrity and they claims at being investigative journalists.
Ryan Holiday, someone knows a thing or two about manipulating the media, writesÂ about the media’s strategy of relying on criminals to do their reporting for them.
At first, I thought the media response to the celebrity hacking scandal was sanctimonious. Now I realize it was rank hypocrisy. Just shameless, awful hypocrisy from a group hardly better than the criminals they enable.
Because after every outlet, from Perez Hilton to Jezebel, called the hack, leak and publishing of nude photos of celebrities, including Kate Upton and Jennifer Lawrence, a crime, none of them seem to have any problem publishing the spoils of the Sony hack, particularly the many private conversations of its co-chairman Amy Pascal.
As Marc Andreessen put it on Twitter last week: âHackers steal a companyâs email files. No bad acts by company revealed. Press prints emails. Journalism, or federal crime?â
Thatâs exactly right. Itâs the question we should be asking here.
How on earth do all these outletsâincluding The New York Times no lessâjustify printing or covering the contents of private emails obtained through clearly criminal acts? And not only that, but many in the media consider it real journalism and, in one case, criticize Sony for âchoosing to stay silentâ for months before telling anyone theyâd been a victim?
âThereâs really no other way to explain the horrifying lack of empathy so many of them show, time and time again, when women of all levels of fame are treated like they exist to be bullied and mocked.â
Well put, Jezebel. It makes it extra ironic that your boss, Nick Denton actually wrote a memo to Gawkerâs staff in which he lauded the publishing of the Sony emails and said âthatâs how good our editorial can be every day.â Really? Thatâs how good? Not: Thatâs how low weâre willing to stoop. This is the same guy who spoke last year about wanting to have a company people were proud to work at. These are the same people who criticized the supposed bullying tactics of #GamerGate, even though what they do is just as bad.
Russell Brand is a sanctimonious liberal elite douchebag.
And he is trouble.
Russell Brand could be banned from Twitter, after he tweeted the contact details of a journalist to his 8.7 million followers.
The comedian tweeted a photograph of the business card of a senior Daily Mail reporter thatÂ included his work phone number, mobile number, and work email address.
In the since-deleted tweet, Brand, 39, alleged the newspaper and itsÂ owner, Lord Rothermere, were avoiding tax.
“Lord Rothermere and @DailyMailUK avoid tax. One of their senior reporters wants to talk about it,” Brand tweeted, with a photograph of reporter Neil Sears’ business card attached.
I mean really?
Wrongly Wrongson, the blogger formerly known as Martyn Martin Bradbury has reported on developments in media, specifically the pending launch of Freed.
Phillip Matthews has written an article for the Dominion Post on the future of left wing blogging.
Unsurprisingly, Matthewsâ insinuatesÂ that it was the Left wing blogs who were to blame for the left wing loss. It wasnât 6 years of mainstream media bias towards Key and their tainted involvement to empower Slater, oh no, it was all us left wing bloggers who are to blame.
It seemsÂ convenient for a member of the very industry that has given the rightÂ the power to weave their Dirty Politics to suggestÂ that itâs the Left wing blogs fault for the Leftâs loss at the ballot box.
With Slater about to launch next year a new weaponised news media âFreed.co.nzâ complete with a drone operator, he will bend and push the boundaries of attack blogsÂ into a whole new realm of horror. How will the left blogosphere compete with a $600 000 right wing attack blog is yet to be seen.
Philip Matthews is a Twitter troll, and a journalist. He is a lot like John Drinnan, just with a smaller newspaper to bleat on it.
HisÂ constant harping and screeching about Dirty Politics led me to block him, he like many journalists think Twitter is the real world. He still misses the point of Dirty Politics. It was an attempt to silence, in my case permanently, opposing political voices.
Nonetheless he has written an article in the DomPost addressing the elephant in the room…the left wings very own dirty politics brigade (but without the influence or relevance).
The leftÂ wing mistook Twitter and blogging for the real world, and failed in their attempts to get me.
But are they part of the problem rather than the solution….after all Martyn Martin Bradbury established The Daily Blog with union funding to be “a Whaleoil killer”…and failed. He never even got close to his stated goal of a million pagewiews a month before the election.
In a parallel universe, David Cunliffe is the prime minister of New Zealand presiding over a Labour-NZ First minority government in a happy arrangement with the Green Party. Internet Mana, backed by German entrepreneur Kim Dotcom, has a few MPs in Parliament, including veteran activist Hone Harawira.
ACT is already history and former Prime Minister John Key has taken a long holiday in Hawaii.
Wake up. The Left was soundly defeated in the 2014 election.
“I think it’s fair to say we haven’t had dreams in colour since September 20,” says Left-wing activist and blogger Martyn Bradbury.
He freely admits he got it horribly wrong. That was his election prediction above. He “didn’t consider for one moment” that voters would rally to National and that high levels of early voting meant that New Zealanders were backing Key.
Instead, Labour had its worst result since 1922, the Greens slipped below their 2011 peak and Harawira is out of Parliament. “Despondent” is a good word to describe how those on the Left feel.
Good to see the UN taking a break from chastising NZ for having worse child poverty than Romania, which strangely hasn’t shown up in the emigration stats as Kiwi parents rush off for a better life.
Catastrophic climate change reports are getting a little embarrassing and being kept quiet while some UN envoy has a hunt around to see if someone has found some somewhere, anywhere.
So the experts at the UN thinks foreign jihadis are joining medieval beheaders because they post fluffy kitten pics on the Internet.
Foreign jihadists from more than 80 countries have flocked to fight in Iraq and Syria on an ‘unprecedented scale’, according to extracts of a UN report.
Around 15,000 people have travelled to fight alongside Islamic State (ISIS) and other hardcore militant groups from ‘countries that have not previously faced challenges relating to Al Qaeda,’ it said.
The study found a new breed of terrorist was being attracted by the extremist group’s ‘cosmopolitan’ use of social media, pointing to examples when jihadists posted ‘kitten photographs’ on Twitter. Â Read more »
Karl du Fresne is a good writer, I enjoy his work.
O’Donnell suggests that by the time of the next general election, social media may have rendered the evening television news bulletin extinct. His theory seems to be that consumers of news (a ghastly phrase) will no longer be prepared to wait until 6pm for their fix, but will update themselves constantly throughout the day by accessing news on their smartphones and tablets.
People have the capability to do that now. But do the vast number who still get their news from newspapers, TV and radio really have such a voracious appetite for information that in future they will demand it in (to use another ghastly phrase) “real time”?
I somehow doubt it, and I wonder whether people like O’Donnell have been misled by their own enthusiasm for the digital revolution and their missionary desire to promote its supposed benefits.
du Fresne is both right and dead wrong.
Same with O’Donnell.
People do want news real time, and they don’t care if the quality is poor, they are happy for it to evolve in the course of the life of the story. Mostly though the medium for consuming news will not be via social media…that will simply be the conduit through which you are informed that news exists.
Social media is vastly over-rated and in New Zealand the so-called Twittersphere is in reality a very small world….populated by vocal lefties and tragics who feel the need to comment one everything but ad zero value to the discourse. Just because you can say something doesn’t mean you should.
On top of that the Twitter warriors who try to mount campaigns and bully, threaten and intimidate overstate their actual reach.
During the whole Dirty Politics saga which was designed to cause maximum pressure on me and my associates, but also designed to subvert an election, I was called by people asking me if I had seen this or that mentioned on Twitter. I almost never had seen. I don’t live with my head inside my phone. Frankly Twitter is a waste of time. Again, the general election result proved that.
If you had listened to the agitators and plotter and the guilty on Twitter then my demise was hoped for, in reality as well as metaphorically, but it failed to materialise. Twitter and social media was supposed to deliver the left an election victory. It failed.
It failed because there is an incredibly small number of people using Twitter, and they only ever talk to each other. They essentially form a group that produces confirmation bias. But when you are wrong and you only talk to people who meet with your ideas of proper political beliefs then all you do is chat agreeing with each other. Â Read more »
Danyl McLauchlan has taken a hiatus from his hiatus…and made a very valid point about just how out of touch the left wing activists are believing their own circle jerk of confirmation bias on Twitter and Facebook.
Hereâs a point I meant to make before i went on hiatus. Hereâs the aggregated polling for the Internet-Mana Party.