I’ve been waiting for this post by Chris Trotter.
He is the left’s canary in the coal mine. When others blame the messenger it is Â Trotter is analysing the message.
MUCH SCORN has been heaped upon the claims of Fairfax political journalist, Vernon Small, that a change of leader could rescue Labourâ€™s electoral fortunes. But shooting the messenger, as so many have done in relation to this story, is a poor substitute for studying the message. Especially a message like this one!
According to Small, if every person who claimed they would vote for Labour if David Cunliffe was no longer its leader kept their word, then support for the party would skyrocket. From its present parlous position, located somewhere between 23 and 25 percent, support would rise by an astonishing 13.5 percentage points to an election-winning 38.5 percent.
Whether this projection is statistically valid or not interests me much less than what the numbers cited by Small tell us about the political preferences of the electorate.
Clearly, there is an extremely large number of voters (several hundred thousand) who would like to vote for the Centre-Left but are disinclined to so while it remains in its current state.
At the heart of this disinclination is the Labour Party itself. Looking at it, they see a tortured, internally fractious, ill-disciplined organisation peopled by individuals who clearly loathe one another, and who seemed determined to not only lose the Election ofÂ 20 September 2014Â â€“ but all subsequent elections.
Not surprisingly, the person they blame for this state of affairs is the Labour leader, David Cunliffe. In spite of so obviously wanting the job, the general consensus among centre-left voters is that, having got it, he has made a God-Almighty mess of it.
Cunliffeâ€™s tentativeness and outright bumbling has both surprised and disappointed his supporters. He had led them to believe that if Labourâ€™s members and trade union affiliates made him their leader he would lead his party in double-quick time back to its democratic socialist roots. But, when Labourâ€™s rank-and-file did exactly as he asked, Cunliffe spent the next three months doing three-fifths of bugger-all. Â Read more »