Whaleoil’s tax and welfare survey reveals that most of us do not like working people being turned into beneficiaries by giving them middle class welfare. Working For Families should be removed and the middle class should be given tax cuts instead.
Should our taxation system lower taxes and encourage more personal responsibility by reducing welfare payments or should we continue to have higher taxes to fund our welfare system?
Click here to share your view.
Polygamy existed in traditional Māori society to a limited extent, mostly practiced by rangatira (tribal chiefs).When New Zealand was annexed into the British Empire in 1840, British law took effect that prohibited polygamous marriage. Colonial law permitted Māori to marry under their own marriage customs, which continued until 1888 (although polygamy was practiced in Māori society – legally or otherwise – well into the 20th century).But in general, polygamy has remained prohibited in New Zealand law.
Polygamy New Zealand law:
Polygamous marriages may not be performed in New Zealand. A married person who enters into another marriage in New Zealand is guilty of the crime of bigamy. Similar rules apply for civil unions, which have been legal in New Zealand since 2005. However, polygamous marriages legally performed in another country have limited recognition in New Zealand law, provided that no person involved was living in New Zealand at the time of the union.
Advocacy for full legalisation of polygamy in New Zealand has come from some libertarian individuals and from individual members of non-Christian religious groups. However, polygamy has little public support among New Zealanders, and no major political party has endorsed its legalisation.
Larry Pickering, an Australian political cartoonist, caricaturist and illustrator of books and calendars at blogspot.co.nz has an answer to ex-JAFA’s question and it has nothing to do with morals and everything to do with money. He uses as an example what is happening in Australia. His post was written in 2014 but is still relevant two years later. His example shows us what happens when a Muslim man who has multiple wives and children arrives in Australia and applies for welfare support.
Chester Borrows, who is one of the wets in National writes a brilliant opinion piece at Fairfax:
In my book kids come first. No matter how frustrating the parents’ situation may be. Situations of their own volition, stupidity, criminality, or just bad luck, if there are kids involved, it pushes all my buttons. I will fall over myself helping and always have. I’m big enough to admit that I probably made decisions last week that I wouldn’t make a second time. We have all made mistakes and I own mine but don’t want them thrown in my face every time I am in need of being cut a little slack. So the starting point is that if there are kids involved, they didn’t have any choice because some adult made a decision for them on their behalf. So let’s think of the kids first.
The whole premise behind providing welfare…it’s for the kids.
Now, about those families who are living in every garage in South Auckland that Andrew Little has told us about but can’t find. Those ones we can see same time; same channel every night – are there a few questions we’d like to ask them? Hell yes. Read more »
The current weeping, wailing and gross over-simplification of the problems at the root of violence and dysfunction will not achieve anything.
Partly this is due to a couple of vital components missing from the discussion which mean most people switched off long ago.
The media cannot be knocked for highlighting societal problems and marchers might also help focus the minds of people in power.
But for things to change you need middle-class outrage and ordinary punters are no longer engaged.
They have heard it all before. “What do you want us to do?” is a common reaction.
We have tried everything and all we have created is a culture of dependence, entitlement, helplessness and irresponsibility.
Of course most of us know condemnation does not work but that initial reaction needs to be acknowledged.
Simon Collins has had his wet dreams realised. A budget that doesn’t fix child poverty.
Especially since child poverty is defined as a percentage of the median wage, it is practically unsolvable….which allows him to pimp some more poor whinging bludgers.
Child poverty advocates say the Budget provides no relief for families struggling to cope with high rents and low incomes.
Interesting term…’child poverty advocates’…are they really in favour of child poverty?
Child Poverty Action Group economist Dr Susan St John said she was hoping for improvements in housing subsidies and family tax credits, but the Budget provided neither of them.
Instead, the Government is quietly implementing changes announced in 2011 to lower the income limit for the maximum family tax credits from $36,827 to $35,000 a year, and to raise the rate at which the credits are reduced from 20c to 25c for every extra dollar earned above the limit. Read more »
How can anyone be terrified by a budget that delivers millions more to bludgers, keeps entitlements as they are and delivers $640 million more for social investment including $200 million for replacing CYF and $200 million more for housing for 750 more places for those with most pressing housing needs, $42m for 3,000 emergency housing places, a new emergency housing grant and $36 million to continue home insulation. Also $100m to free up land in Auckland for housing?
Well the NZ Herald must have them on speed dial because Simon Collins managed to find a bloke, if you can call him that, who is “terrified” of the budget.
A man who spent 18 years in state care says he is “terrified” by the Budget changes to Child, Youth and Family.
Daryl Brougham, who wrote a book last year about his experiences, said the extra $95 million a year for the new “super-CYF” children’s ministry would go mostly to private contractors through competitive tenders.
Some of the worst experiences in his life in care were when children’s homes closed down because contractors lost their contracts. Read more »
Larry Williams makes some sensible prognostications on housing and politicians.
Nobody can surely claim that our welfare system is unfair. To the contrary, we have a world class welfare system with accommodation supplements, Working for Families and other welfare payments. Compared to other countries, our welfare system is generous.
I suspect that is part of the problem. This country’s intergenerational welfare is integral to many of the social problems we have today. Labour have been leaders in this.Redistribution of taxpayer money into welfare has been at the forefront of Labour’s policies for decades. National, or should I say ‘Labour Light’, are no better. Successive governments are culpable in embedding the scourge of welfare. Welfare used to be a hand up, but that concept was discarded a long time ago.
The PM has told those people whinging to the Media party about their housing predicament to go see aid agencies, like WINZ.
Prime Minister John Key has advised those who are homeless or living in garages to go and see Work and Income.
His comments come after social housing groups and community workers have called on the government to increase their supply of affordable housing.
There have been reports families in Auckland have been forced to rent garages and shipping containers, with the Salvation Army estimating one in ten Auckland garages is rented out to a family.
Social agencies say the number of families living out of their cars has grown.
Newshub are all aghast at the beneficiary reforms, which most hard working Kiwi taxpayers will be cheering for.
Newshub can reveal the full extent of the Government’s crackdown on beneficiaries.
Since hard-line welfare reforms in 2013, 165,177 sanctions have been placed on beneficiary payments.
The majority were for failing to attend an appointment, but also included failing a drugs test and refusing a job.
The penalties range from a 25 percent reduction in benefit to a full cancellation for 13 weeks.
Today there was a steady stream of foot traffic into Newtown’s WINZ office in Wellington, hoping to avoid penalties for breaking the benefit rules. Read more »