On Monday David Shearer ruled out standing down Jones over his involvement in the Bill Liu cash for citizenship caseÂ with Larry Williams on Monday night.
He explicitly said says it’s meaningless anyway.
What new information has he received that made him change his mind?
Perhaps it was the information that the herald brought to light on top of the sterling work done by Wishart on the Bill Liu case back in 08/09.
This Herald articleÂ from 2009 also makes an interesting observation:
Liu was considered a high-risk gambler by the DIA’s casino monitoring division because of his volatility, high-stakes gambling and history of self-barring, the Herald was told.
A DIA spokesman confirmed that Liu was of interest. “Mr Liu is one of a number of gamblers of significance whom the department has discussed in its interaction with SkyCity”.
Liu’s gambling also attracted the attention of the police. That interest was at times intense and included surveillance, a source told the Herald. “The focus was to see whether evidence of money laundering could be detected.” No charges have been laid.
… so Liu was being watched by the DIA and police for potentially laundering money – as well as his immigration issues – but Jones still approved citizenship.
Has Labour only just googled this stuff?
It is also interesting that apart from claiming that he would be executed he also claimed membership of Falun Gong. There is a little problem with given his propensity for gambling.Â Falun Gong prohibits gamblingÂ so his claim to be a member (which Jones appears to have accepted) seems a bit convenient:
As part of its emphasis on ethical behavior, Falun Gong’s teachings prescribe a strict personal morality for practitioners, which includes abstention from smoking, drugs, gambling, premarital or extramarital sex, and homosexuality.
David Shearer has kicked this to the Auditor-General but their request is for the Auditor-General to look at the process….not the decision. This is farcical.
â€śIâ€™ve asked for the Auditor-General to look into all the departmental as well as ministerial processes involved in this case.
â€śShane has encouraged me to take this action because he has been left in the impossible position of not being able to clear his name. An inquiry will enable him to do so.
â€śWhile the inquiry is underway, Shane Jones will stand down from his portfolio responsibilities and from Labourâ€™s Front Bench.
Based on what Labour has asked of the Auditor-General they are simply trying on what Helen Clark did with Philip Field. There really should be a full indepedent inquiry now.