Daily Roundup

Whaleoil backchat

Good evening, welcome to Whaleoil Backchat.

On Backchat, you are free to share your own stories, discuss other news or catch up with friends. To participate you’ll need to sign up for a Disqus account which is free, quick, and easy.

On posts that are not articles like this one, you do not have to stay ‘on topic’ but you do still need to follow our commenting rules. 

Please read our rules before you start commenting on Whaleoil to avoid a temporary or permanent ban.

NOTE: Moderation queries MUST be expressed VIA EMAIL and not by posting a comment.

To check if your ban might have been caused by Disqus, or to ask for a banning decision to be reviewed, email the voluntary HELP DESK with your Disqus username in the subject line. Please be respectful and do not make demands.

Today in rock history

Today in Rock History:

Born today in 1948, Mick Taylor singer, songwriter and guitarist with John Mayall’s Bluesbreakers, The Rolling Stones and solo.

Read more »

The curious case of the reef that didn’t die

2017: Can no longer be saved.

The GWPF reprints an article from the paywalled The Australian where Peter Ridd writes about the Great Barrier Reef. Peter Ridd used to be a physicist at James Cook University’s marine geophysical laboratory until he was fired this year for not toeing the climate scare line. Quote.

2018: Oops, no, as you were, nature is doing what nature does.

This unreliability of the science is now a widely accepted scandal in many other areas of study and it has a name: the replication crisis. When checks are made to replicate or confirm scientific results, it is regularly found that about half have flaws.

Scientists from James Cook University have just published a paper on the bleaching and death of corals on the Great Barrier Reef and were surprised that the death rate was less than they expected, because of the adaptability of corals to changing temperatures. End quote.

Golly gosh, who’d a thunk it? Nature can cope with natural variations in temperature. Quote.

It appears as though they exaggerated their original claims and are quietly backtracking. End quote.

Noooo! Climate scientists exaggerating claims? Never! Quote.

To misquote Oscar Wilde, to exaggerate once is a misfortune, to do it twice looks careless, but to do it repeatedly looks like unforgivable systemic unreliability by some of our major science organisations.

The very rapid adaptation of corals to high temperatures is a well-known phenomenon; besides, if you heat corals in a given year, they tend to be less susceptible in the future to overheating. This is why corals are one of the least likely species to be affected by climate change, irrespective of whether you believe the climate is changing by natural fluctuations or because of human influence.

Corals have a unique way of dealing with changing temperature, by changing the microscopic plants that live inside them. These microscopic plants, called zooxanthellae, give the coral energy from the sun through photosynthesis in exchange for a comfortable home inside the coral. When the water gets hot, these little plants effectively become poisonous to the coral and the coral throws them out, which turns the coral white — that is, it bleaches.

But most of the time, the coral will recover from the bleaching. And here’s the trick: the corals take in new zooxanthellae, that floats around in the water quite naturally, and can select different species that are better suited to hot weather.

Most other organisms have to change their genetic make-up to deal with temperature changes — something that can take many generations. But corals can do it in a few weeks by just changing the plants that live in them.

They have learned a thing or two in a couple of hundred million years of evolution.

The problem here is that the world has been completely misled about the effects of bleaching by scientists who rarely mention the spectacular regrowth that occurs. For example, the 2016 bleaching event supposedly killed 93 per cent, or half, or 30 per cent of the reef, depending on which headline and scientist you want to believe. […] End quote.

And, presumably 97% of scientists agreed. Quote.

But this is just the tip of the exaggeration iceberg. Some very eminent scientists claim that bleaching never happened before the 1980s and is entirely a man-made phenomenon. This was always a ridiculous proposition.

A recent study of 400-year-old corals has found that bleaching has always occurred and is no more common now than in the past. Scientists have also claimed that there has been a 15 per cent reduction in the growth rate of corals. However, some colleagues and I demonstrated that there were ­serious errors in their work and that, if anything, there has been a slight increase in the coral growth rate over the past 100 years. […]

But the truth will out eventually. The scare stories about the Barrier Reef started in the 1960s, when scientists first started work on it. They have been crying wolf ever since. But the data keeps coming in and, yes, sometimes a great deal of coral dies in a spectacular manner, with accompanying media fanfare. It is like a bushfire on land — it looks terrible at first, but it quietly and rapidly grows back, ready for the scientists to peddle their story all over again. End quote.

The Australian

I survived Communism: Part four

Statues remembering the victims of the Communist era in the Czech capital Prague

The article below was written by Zuzana Janosova Den Boer, who experienced Communist rule in Czechoslovakia before coming to Canada.

Economic Consequences of Communism:

Do you think communism failed because of oppression?  No. You can brainwash and threaten people, keep them dangling like puppets, until the supply of goods starts to disappear.   Economic reality always prevails.

The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other’s people money.

Margaret Thatcher

The economic consequences of communism are always the same – poverty, and this one comes with an ironclad guarantee – a lifetime warranty. People always spend their own money more carefully than someone else’s. Capitalism is about efficiency. Private businesses must spend their capital very carefully. They cannot afford to make investments in their business unless they are sure it will be worth it. A mistake could result in an increased price for their product, reduced cash-flow, loss of competitiveness and eventual bankruptcy.

Read more »

Ham it up this summer

Ham and egg salad

Fresh Summer Ham.

Missed out on a Ham for Christmas?

Or, did you order a ham but now it is all gone?

Do you want a summer ham to enjoy?

Don’t despair, we have limited stocks available, so order now.

Only the Whale Meat Company offers you Restaurant Quality Cooked on the Bone (COB) Ham that has been taste tested.

These hams are sought after – Get in quick or miss out.

Read more »

The left keep mainstreaming anti-Semitism

Caption: The left – for the many, not the Jew.

Let’s get this straight: there are no Nazis any more. Even neo-Nazis are a tiny pimple on the hairy right buttcheek of contemporary politics. They’re impotent attention-whores whose only purpose is getting into a circle-jerk with relevance-deprived mainstream media. For all the yammering of hysterical ninnies, we are not about to return to the 1930s.

But, for all their fainting fits about imaginary ‘Nazis’, the great hypocrisy of the contemporary left is that they are the closest anyone is coming to even remotely emulating the brownshirts. Not only are their paramilitaries out in the streets, ruthlessly stomping on dissenters, but the left are busily reviving the festering corpse of the Nazis’ greatest grievance: anti-Semitism.

Read more »

Daily sudoku

This is Subscriber Content.

You can access subscriber content, including crosswords, sudoku, polling, commentary and podcasts by subscribing to one of our membership packages.

Whaleoil wisdom

This piece of Whaleoil wisdom was brought to you by the Whaleoil Store.

Visit us now and find the perfect piece of Whaleoil swag for your collection.

The consequences of #metoo

Oprah and Harvey Weinstein

A year ago, women were walking on the red carpet, dressed in black designer dresses to campaign against sexual harassment against starlets. It was a moment in time of pure self indulgence, when women who made millions in the movies wanted sympathy for the way they chose to advance their careers. After all, everyone who went to Harvey Weinstein’s hotel room knew his reputation. For many of them, if that was what it took to advance your movie career, well so be it.

Like everything, there are unforeseen consequences, and these are now being identified in the corporate world. Women simply cannot have it all ways. Sad for ambitious women with real talent, but there it is. quote.

No more dinners with female colleagues. Don’t sit next to them on flights. Book hotel rooms on different floors. Avoid one-on-one meetings.
In fact, as a wealth adviser put it, just hiring a woman these days is “an unknown risk.” What if she took something he said the wrong way?
Across Wall Street, men are adopting controversial strategies for the #MeToo era and, in the process, making life even harder for women.
end quote.

This was inevitable. The pushback against sexual harassment in the workplace started back in the 1980s, and most younger men would not dream of treating women inappropriately at work nowadays. The actions of a few very wealthy, self indulged women have made life much harder for women trying to make it in the corporate world, because men steer clear of them with the aid of a 10 foot pole. quote.

Read more »