Labour Mutterings on Hides Spending

[Imported from Whale Oil Beef Hooked on Blogger]

NZPA reports that the Labour party is looking into Rodney Hide’s spending:

The Labour Party is investigating ACT leader Rodney Hide’s spending in Epsom with a view to lodging a petition in the High Court.

Mr Hide won the seat from National’s Richard Worth and brings to Parliament one other MP — Heather Roy.

Should a petition be successful a by-election would be held in which Mr Hide would not be able to stand.

Labour Party president Mike Williams told NZPA local members in Epsom were looking into the spending. The party would make a decision by October 25 whether to proceed with the petition or not.

As I’ve blogged previously, I’m not one who believes that National “needs” ACT. In fact, if they did not exist, and their whole (small?) 1.5% had have gone to National, then National would be the biggest party in Parliament, and NZF and UF would be offering National confidence and supply, not Labour.

There also seems to be quite a bit of debate around the blogosphere about what would happen if a petition were successful against either Bob Clarkson or Hide. Frogblog makes mention of this, and Blog-central does too. Having not read the Electoral Act, nor intending to any time soon, I won’t be attempting any predictions!


Do you want ad-free access to our Daily Crossword?

Do you want access to daily Incite Politics Magazine articles?

Silver Subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.

53%