A little experiment in firelighting

I think I might head off to the Coromandel on the weekend and try a little experiment.

I think I will light a fire, after all the fire ban can’t be that serious if Jeanette and Harry don’t get prosecuted.

All the years that I used to go to the Coromandel for my holidays when I was a kid we all knew about fire bans. Then there are the ads on TV.

My point is this. If there is a fire ban why is it not enforced?

If there is no need to enforce the ban then there mustn’t be a need for the ban. Why has the fire ban not been lifted for the Coromandel.

I bet if I light my fire, I get prosecuted. I bet that if I defend myself and invoke the Fitzsimons defence I will get nowhere other than a police cell.

This might sound like a dissertation long after the event but I have thought a bit about this and can’t come to any other cconclusion than those above.

There is either a Fire Ban or Not. It can’t be both. If there is a ban then offenders should be held accountable and I would argue that a quasi-minister/spokesperson for the Government should indeed be held accountable to a higher standard than most.

Unfortunately the standards of this government and it hack supporters are such that no higher standard is held for those in positions of power especially in relation to forgery, speeding, assault, bullying, lying, immigration scams and now breaching fire bans.

It seems that those who are actually held accountable are either Maori (Samuels, Tamihere) of not friends of Helens (Smith, Ardern, Dalziel).

Do you want:

  • ad-free access?
  • access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • access to Incite Politics magazine articles?

Silver subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March.

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.