Perhaps Minister Samuels and Minister Carter should read the Cabinet Manual

And while they are at it have Helen Clark take a remedial course in the reposnibilities outlined in the Cabinet Manual .

For the benefit of those too lazy to click the link and read for themselves, Section 3 of the Cabinet manual relates to Decision Makiong: Principles and Procedures.

From my reading Conservation Minister Chris Carter has clearly breached Section 3.14 on Items for consideration for Cabinet in at least two places (bold)

3.14: The following matters must be submitted to Cabinet (through the appropriate committee):

* significant policy issues;
* proposals that will affect the government's financial position, or Important financial commitments;

* matters concerning the machinery of government;

* proposals involving new legislation or regulations;

* government responses to select committee recommendations;

* matters concerning the portfolio interests of a number of Ministers (particularly where agreement cannot be reached);

* controversial matters;

* all but the most minor public appointments;

* international treaties and agreements (see paragraphs 3.36 – 3.37);

* the release of public discussion documents, or reports of a substantive nature affecting government policy or government agencies.

He has also breached Section 3.27;

3.27 Ministers must use their judgement in deciding which matters concerning the exercise of their individual statutory powers would affect the collective interest of the government and should therefore be brought to Cabinet:
Matters that should, as a general rule, be brought to Cabinet include: all but the most minor appointments; matters of general public interest, importance or concern; or decisions with a public policy element (see also paragraphs 3.13 – 3.14).

Further, in criticising Mr Carter, Dover Samuels has breached Section 3.21;

3.21 Acceptance of ministerial office requires acceptance of collective responsibility. Issues are often debated vigorously within the confidential setting of Cabinet meetings, although consensus is usually reached and votes are rarely taken. Once Cabinet makes a decision, then (except as provided in paragraph 3.23) Ministers must support it, regardless of their personal views and whether or not they were at the meeting concerned.

Clearly then we have two ministers who have blatantly disregarded the Cabinet Manual. If in fact Chris Carter did take the issue to Cabinet then not has he lied to Parliament then so has the Prime Minister in saying that he (the minister) and he alone made the decision.

Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.