Unions throwing weight about over tax

Give me a break Cullen, why is it ok to look at over taxation with regards to redundancy payouts but not the rest of us poor fools who end up in the top tax bracket?

I fail to see why redundancy payouts should be treated any different from any other income. It is simple, if you earn over $60,000 for the year including your redundancy payout then cop the tax like any other Kiwi.

Sheesh, unions have a hide. Union Bovver boy and secretary of the Labour Party's union affiliates council, Paul Tolich, said the unions had been lobbying ministers about the issue for some time, but had not proposed a specific alternative.

It begs the questions, What is the payoff for the Unions and the Labour Party of this lobbying? Are Labour running a "policy for donations" scam? What has been said in these back-room deals that they euphemistically call lobbying?

Related link: Redundancy tax break looks likely – 05 Jul 2007 – NZ Herald: New Zealand National news

Powered by ScribeFire.


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • Hermione Grainger

    You might call it getting laid, but taking 2 and a half inches up your arse is not my idea of sex.


    Horrid what the 'roids do to a man, isn't it? 

    Tongue out

  • Whaleoil

    Hey, don't knock it till you've tried it baby!!! ;-)

  • Adolf Fiinkensein

    The above interchange would suggest unionists use semen as invisible ink for coded messages.  On a less anatomical level You must aske yourself why the shitheads don't have their reduncy spread over two financial years.  The real reason of course is that most of them go straight into a new job and get paid double for some months.  More instituionalsised theft from labour and their friends.