Stinging rebuke from Paul Henry

Paul Henry is right on the money as he breaks his silence.

Henry told New Idea it was clear that Sheila Dikshit’s name was pronounced the way it looked. “I’m appalled that this country officially apologised. It was unreasonable for India to seek an apology, and worse that we gave one. We are apologising for one person in the country exercising their right to freedom of speech. I think that’s an outrage.

“Where is the greater offence? Laughing at somebody’s surname or actually deliberately mispronouncing it so it isn’t funny?”

Henry told New Idea the saga had left him astonished and dumbfounded. “What happens on a Monday morning on a breakfast show is about as important in your life as the bug that flew into your room the night before.

“If people want to elevate you to godlike status or want to put you between one country and another’s free-trade agreement, that says more about them than it does about you.”

He is dead right. It was completely unreasonable for India to seek the apology and worse that our High Commissioner gave one. He should have told them to FRO. The appalling display of unions and liberal hand-wringers over the Henry affair said a great deal about them. They campaigned to have a state employee sacked. A union, campaigning to have a state employee sacked, and all over a couple of throw away comments he was encouraged to say.

Former Breakfast host Paul Henry says TVNZ encouraged him to be provocative – but then treated him unreasonably when his on-air comments sparked a public backlash and led to his resignation.

They lapped up the ratings, and they cut his throat. He has every right to feel aggrieved.

Do you want ad-free access to our Daily Crossword?

Do you want access to daily Incite Politics Magazine articles?

Silver Subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.