Botany Selection – Ed Saafi

Now the Botany pre-selection has been made and I have had time to learn more about Ed Saafi, i will list his pros and cons like I have with the other candidates. As with my post on Maggie Barry readers should not think I am taking sides or advocating delegates vote in a certain way.

From what i can gather Ed is one of the many highly educated second and third generation Pacific Islanders who have made honoured their parents and grand-parents wishes, and done well at school and university. He is a family man with the same concerns that most New Zealanders have, especially getting his children a good education so they have choices in life.

Ed is a medical researcher with a Ph.D, and obviously has intellectual heft and stickability to make it through the minimum of seven years of study.

Pros

  • Highly educated, remembering that National doesnt have many Ph.Ds in caucus.
  • Tongan and National is light on Pacific Island representation
  • Been involved in the party since 2007
  • Worked for some years on building pacific island membership for National

Cons

  • Destiny candidate in 2005
  • Tongan and National doesn’t do quotas in electorate selection
  • Not outgoing enough to be a good politician

Apart from his Destiny candidacy no-one who knows Ed has a bad word to say against him. If he is unsuccessful in Botany he could well be the candidate in Mangere, the only seat in Auckland that does not have a National MP as the incumbent or as List MP for the area. National won’t win Mangere but if Ed is selected there he may end up getting in on the list.


Do you want ad-free access to our Daily Crossword?

Do you want access to daily Incite Politics Magazine articles?

Silver Subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.

59%