If maps kill people…

The screw loose useful idiots of the left wing are desperately trying to prove that a map made someone kill some and therefore the gun was vicariously in Sarah Palins hand.

This is the image they say put the target onto Arizona representative Gabrielle Giffords:

Sarah Palin PAC map

Now to use their correlation, that maps kill people, then we can similarly hold the Democrats responsible for killing their own representative because this mp is from their own Heartland Strategy:

Democrat Heartland Strategy Map

Democrats use "bulls eye" targets extensively in their political graphics. This map shows states Democrats want targeted. Arizona, which Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords represents, is surrounded by these targets.

As you can see the Democrats have “killed” their own with their map. This argument is of course ludicrous but it is the argument that the nutters at The Standard and other left wing sites are trying to pull….that somehow maps cause people to kill and that therefore puts the gun into the hands of the map creator or owner.

We can now re-write the old saying that guns don’t kill people, maps do.

The only person responsible for this terrible killing and attempted assassination is the insane person behind the trigger, no one else. It is ludicrous to suggest otherwise. And I don’t even care what his politics are. He is just plain nuts thinking shooting people is going to solve anything.

I know one thing for sure though. He is not a Tea party supporter…in one of his videos he is shooting up and then burning a US flag. Patriots don’t do that…ever.


Do you want ad-free access to our Daily Crossword?

Do you want access to daily Incite Politics Magazine articles?

Silver Subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.

48%