Save a Beach?

There is a campaign to save a beach. It even has a semi cool name – New Chum. Perhaps that is because plenty of shark like to swim there and any swimmers are considered chum. Anyway some developers want us the taxpayer to cough up $10 million to match their “contribution” to “save” a beach. The real reason is that the developers are probably skint and have come up with a cunning plan for some corporate welfare to get back their sunk costs. Nevertheless I think the idea has merit.

Predictably, Labour have jumped on the bandwagon, including Phil Goff who is desperate for any good news just 4 days into the new year. Still the sight of Caropotamus sitting on a beach is something we should all be afraid of…the wonder is the people of Matarangi didn’t try to re-float her.

Now, I can help Labour out and the developers, as well as protect the beach for future generations. The solution is easy.

Take the money off the NZSO and buy the beach.

Let’s face it, times are tight and coming up with $10 million is a tough ask. So we have to make choices. I agree with Labour on this one but Phil Goff must make a choice. Fund the NZSO for a year which will cost about the same (they get over $13 million in taxpayer subsidies per annum), or save a beach for future generations.

It’s a pretty simple decision. I’d go for the beach. Reeef the cash off the NZSO and if you need a bit more take the rest from the Royal NZ Ballet.

So far if we had used the Whaleoil method of public funds redistribution we would have saved a beach and provided the cash for Search and Rescue.


Do you want ad-free access to our Daily Crossword?

Do you want access to daily Incite Politics Magazine articles?

Silver Subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.

41%