Phil's Replacement will need to do this

Julia Gillard is trying to change the way the ALP operates, reducing the impact of unions and factions. Labour here do not have formal factions but they do have a system that promotes seriously average and unelectable union hacks over good quality candidates who can appeal to the public.

Her proposals are broadly in line with the spirit of the report, which noted that Labor’s membership was ageing and haemorrhaging, leaving the party unable to man some election booths in last year’s election. It proposed a system of US-style primaries for preselections in open or non-Labor held seats, with a guaranteed 20 per cent share of the vote for union members, 60 per cent for ALP members and 20 per cent for non-member supporters.

This is quite the system that allows National to have seriously talented people like Mark Mitchell or Maggie Barry win selection in safe seats without having done years of drudgery in the party. This is one enduring advantage National has over Labour, selection of good people from outside the party is possible.

Labour needs to look closely at why it has a party list that ranks useless, unelectable union hacks ahead of high quality people with a long term future. Moroney at 10 ahead of Grant Roberston? Darien Fenton 9 places ahead of Stuart Nash. Nash is also behind 18 year veteran and well known useless bastard with nothing to offer Labour in the future Rick Barker – sending a really clear message that Labour rewards hacks not talented new comers even if the hacks are well past their used by dates.


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • pdm

    With Barker jumping ship from Tukituki after two thrashings by Craig Foss watch for Foss to absolutely deal to Labours new pretender in the seat. Our daughter who lives in Havelock North described Julia Haydon-Carr, Barkers replacement, as a snooty bitch who is hugely disliked in the area.

    • Piers

      A Havelock, foss supporter, describes Julia H-C as snooty?  Hello pot, kettle calling!!

    • Hootz

      Seriously???? I am by no means a Labour voter, and won’t be voting Labour.  I live out of Julia’s catchment, but up until early 2011 lived in the Hawkes Bay.  I know Julia through work.  Julia would have to be the most genuinely passionate person I know when it comes to health, children and getting equality for people.  She can talk to anybody about anything, from the “Hoighty Toighty” Havelockians, to the unemployed mother of 5 in a small rural town.  She may not win, and she IS realistic in this, but she will push Foss’s boundariesd and make him very uncomfortabel.  This, I think, is not a bad thing!!!!

  • thor42

    Well, I say “thank Gawd” that Labour *does* love union hacks.
    It means that the party will *never* be elected because people *really like them*. They will only be elected when people eventually get bored with the Nats.
    In other words, the unions are an in-built, permanent disfigurement for Labour. A bit like a dirty old uncle in the family (uncle Union) who compulsively masturbates at get-togethers, but which the Labour “family” just refuses to disown.