Trotter flays Mallard

Chris Trotter is likely to join Sir Peter Leitch in being described as a class traitor after today’s post where he flays Trevor Mallard for his inept attack on Bryce Edwards.

THE OTHER event also involved the Internet. Indeed, that’s where it happened – on the Labour Party blogsite, “Red Alert”. In a posting headed“Bill English Funds Bryce Edwards”, the Labour caucus’s chief election strategist, Trevor Mallard, launched a vicious attack on the young University of Otago academic, Dr Bryce Edwards, for his, at times, highly critical assessments of the Labour Opposition’s performance.

The Bill English reference stemmed from Mr Mallard’s contention that, since Dr Edwards’ “NZ Politics Daily” (a compilation of political stories carried that day in the New Zealand media) is partly sponsored by the National Party’s polling agency, Curia Market Research, it is indirectly subsidised by the state (via Parliamentary Services) and, therefore, by the Minister of Finance, Bill English.

The gob-smacking absurdity of this claim (another sponsor of Dr Edward’s compilation is the PSA union!) was only matched by the Labour MP’s accompanying insults. According to Mr Mallard, Dr Edwards is “one of the few remaining supporters of the Alliance”, who is being “bank-rolled” to provide “political commentary which mainly attacks Labour and the Greens from the looney left.”

Rounding off his attack, Mr Mallard declared: “The guy makes Margaret Mutu look like a well-balanced academic.”

It is difficult to know where to begin with this outburst.

It was a bizarre attack , one which Clare Curran followed up on Twitter on Saturday night flinging dirt and more accusations at me amongst a host of others.

That it was made by the caucus’s chief strategist raises a whole host of questions about the nature of the election campaign Labour is intending to run.

Does Phil Goff sanction this stuff? We can only hope that he does notendorse the sort of crude ad hominem arguments featured in Mr Mallard’s posting. We must hope, too, that Labour’s appeal to the electorate is fuelled by emotions considerably less disreputable than the petty spitefulness and partisan hostility which it displays.

Needless to say, Mr Mallard’s outburst did not go unnoticed by Labour’s opponents – or its friends. The blogosphere was soon buzzing with negative commentary and, like the You-Tube clip from the “Mech Suite”, the posting’s audience began to expand. Within days, the number of people in receipt of Mr Mallard’s “wisdom” had grown exponentially.

Is Phil Goff really in command of the troops? I suspect not. Trotter then talks about tone:

ALL ELECTIONS have a “tone”: a mode of address to the voting public which (largely unconsciously) “cues” their response to the competing parties.

If we compare and contrast the tone of the You-Tube clip of the PM’s visit to the “Mech Suite”, with the tone of Mr Mallard’s “Red Alert” posting, picking the election result becomes a cinch.

Sometimes, little things generate big consequences.

I’m just waiting for Trotter’s post to be labelled part of the wider #bryceedwardsconspiracy.

 

 


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • jabba

    After Mallard realised how badly he was treated by Helen Clark, she made him look like her little puppy, he decided that Labour was indeed an appalling directionless political party and he decided to destroy it from within.. How else could his behaviour be explained?

  • petal

    I was thinking about this as well today.

    To be honest, if it was reported that Mallard was turned and is now on the National Party payroll, would that not actually make MORE sense then him being a Labour Party strategist?

    • thor42

      Agreed!
      Yeah – quite a clumsy and ill-considered outburst by The Duck, really.

  • reid

    Perhaps Trev’s just trying to do his absolute worst to really tank Phil cause Silent-T has promised him a really good portfolio like shadow Foreign Affairs if he does it really well. What’s the downside?

  • Eric

    I guess it’s proof of the old (Australian) proverb, You don’t have to have a long neck to be a goose.

41%