At least it didn’t say inbred and adulterous

There is a bit of an upset in the UK about a BBC documentary that has been described as misleading and offensive:

It was misleading and offensive for the BBC documentary on George V and Queen Mary to overplay the Windsors’ German heritage.

The BBC documentary on George V and Queen Mary was in many ways a suitable prelude to this year’s Diamond Jubilee. Its argument that George V, however unlikely a moderniser, set the monarchy on the path it has successfully followed since, was sound. As the Prince of Wales (the future Edward VIII, later Duke of Windsor) wrote to his father on November 5, 1918, the British monarchy could survive what he described as “the regular epidemic of revolutions and abdications” on the Continent “only by keeping in the closest possible touch with the people” – advice which George V may not have needed, but certainly followed.

In one respect, however, the BBC programme was misleading, and annoyingly so. It placed great emphasis on the Royal family’s German roots. Now, it is true that in 1917, in response to what the historian Roger Fulford called “a very silly outcry – largely engineered from Fleet Street”, George V changed the dynasty’s name from Saxe-Coburg-Gotha to Windsor, and also that on one occasion his eldest son said he was “three-quarters German”. Nevertheless, in saying this he was mistaken, and the Royal family’s Germanness has been much exaggerated. A recent example comes in Norman Davies’s book Vanished Kingdoms. Davies states that the family were essentially German, but “honed their upper-class English accents, threw themselves into patriotic and charitable activities, spoke no German in public, deflected awkward questions, avoided their German relatives, and, in a sustained campaign of genealogical legerdemain, massaged the family tree beyond recognition”. Professor Davies is a distinguished historian; yet even distinguished historians sometimes write what is no better than rot.

Could have been worse I suppose, they could have described the royal family as inbred and adulterous.

Do you want:

  • ad-free access?
  • access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • access to Incite Politics magazine articles?

Silver subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March.

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.