Proof that bad schools aren’t just low decile

In this morning’s Herald we have proof that bad schools aren’t just low decile:

The Education Review Office has recommended intervention at a top Auckland primary school after a scathing report.

Chelsea Primary School in Birkenhead is a decile 10 school for up to 400 children.

Its 2008 ERO report showed off an excellent school with a high expectation of students and a sound relationship between members of senior staff and the board of trustees.

However, its latest review – released at the end of January – notes “disharmony” between senior staff and a breakdown in communication with parents and the wider school community.

“The school is not well placed to sustain and improve its performance,” the report reads.

“Governance operations are compromised by disharmony within the board. These poor relationships are a barrier to school progress.”

The report says aspects reviewed at the school included the emotional safety of students – including prevention of bullying – physical safety of students, teacher registration, attendance and stand-downs, suspensions, expulsions and exclusions. It found a number of areas of non-compliance relating to school governance and management.

“ERO recommends that the Secretary of Education consider intervention under Part 7A of the Education Act 1989 in order to support the board of trustees to address the issues related to governance and management identified in this report.”

It just shows that must mean there is such a thing as a good teacher, a good principal or a good board…and likewise that bad teachers are in good schools which turn them bad along with bad principals in good schools turning them bad.

Do you want:

  • ad-free access?
  • access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • access to Incite Politics magazine articles?

Silver subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March.

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.