A Guest Post Series from Mr A. Investor.
There has been some news coverage of the big drop in Chorus Networks’ shareprice over the last few days thanks to a “draft proposal” by the Mad Dogs of the Commerce Commission.
It seems the Commerce Commission’s unexpectedly large interference in the so called re-benchmarking of copper prices has seen a calamitous drop in the share price of Chorus. (Re-benchmarking is the spin weasel name for the state forcing a company’s prices down).
Unlike Kiwiblog, we don’t think it’s wonderful news.
There are going to be some ongoing consequences from this mad dog attack, so we’ll be taking a closer look at the costs of this state agency intervention over the next few days, and examine some of the potentially disastrous effects the Mad Dogs have created for the Government.
Last Friday, Chorus lost $103million in shareholder value, thanks to the Commerce Commissions blunderbuss approach to forcing Chorus’ price down. The magnitude of Chorus’ loss was amplified by a combination of the unexpectedness and the ferocity of the Mad Dog attack. Chorus got bit, and bit hard.
Yesterday, investors continued to flee the bitten victim. Chorus lost another $80million in value, meaning investor losses totalled $180m for the two days.
That includes YOUR money if you happen to have investments in KiwiSaver, mutual funds or directly owned shares.
The flow on effects of this attack contributed to negative sentiment for the NZ sharemarket for those past two days. (Of course, Monday’s losses included concerns over Europe, but only Chorus fell like drunk down a staircase).
It’s not just about Chorus. Other utility and infrastructure companies face ongoing significant regulatory uncertainty thanks to the Mad Dogs at the Commerce Commission.
Power companies like Vector and Contact, plus other infrastructure companies have all faced unexpected regulatory burdens thanks to a state agency which clearly doesn’t care about the mess it creates for others.
The big worry is this – if Chorus (who only split out of Telecom last year to satisfy regulatory concerns) is capable of being bitten by a mad dog, then what attacks await the mixed ownership model companies that will be offered to investors later this year and next?
Why is the Commission behaving like this?
And who needs a half full crap-bag of smelly hikoi walkers protesting against SOE sales, when a state agency is doing a bang-up job of scaring investors away – from ALL of the NZ sharemarket? Sharebrokers like First NZ Capital are warning that overseas investors had taken notice and would stay away from NZ’s sharemarket.
So then, what’s the National Government going to do to reduce regulatory uncertainty? Or will they let the mixed ownership models face failure because they’re not prepared to restrain their mad dog?
Since you’re here … we’ve got a favour to ask. Advertising revenues across media are falling fast. And unlike other news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our work available to everyone. Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil. Your contribution helps us survive in a hostile market.