Judges v Commonsense

Sometimes, and rather more often than we would like, the law looks like an ass.

You could read this finding twice, or ten times, but you would be battling to understand why one of NZ’s most vicious repeated sex offenders should be gifted $1000 from the taxpayers for his totally worthless attempt to screw the judicial system.

Imagine of we could recall judges?

One of New Zealand’s most notorious sex offenders has been awarded $1000 in costs after a failed attempt to sue the Corrections Department.

Nicholas Reekie sued the Corrections Department, the Attorney-General and Waitakere District Court for humiliation and unlawful detention while in Auckland’s Paremoremo Prison in 2001 and 2002, to the sum of $1 million.

In August Justice Edwin Wylie ruled that his rights were breached when he was strip-searched by prison staff but also ruled that Reekie would not get any compensation for the ill-treatment.

Justice Wylie also found that the majority of Reekie’s claims were not made out and only two of his 10 actions were successful.

Because Reekie did not suffer any detrimental effects from the ill-treatment, a declaration of the breaches was all that was required by the Correction Department staff.

In the decision Justice Wylie said costs should lie where they fell.

But Reekie then filed an application seeking costs worth $5762, made up of lawyer costs, travel costs and phone bills.

Justice Wylie today said the general principle was that the unsuccessful party should pay costs, but it was at the court’s discretion.

“In accordance with settled principle, I am not persuaded that it is appropriate to make a general costs order in favour of Mr Reekie. “There is nothing to depart from the general rule that a litigant in person is not normally entitled to costs,” he said.

But he said it was appropriate allow Reekie a contribution towards counsel fees incurred by him for the preparation and filing of his original statement of claim.

Reekie was awarded $1000 in costs, to be paid to him by the Department of Corrections.


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

29%