How to avoid the arse card for having a sook online about your boss

With more and more people using social media it is becoming increasingly frequent that people get the arse card from work because of intemperate comments on Facebook or Twitter.

In the US the National labour Relations Board has said you have a right to have a sook, but there are some boundaries you need to keep within.

The right of workers to get together and moan about their bosses has been enshrined in U.S. law ever since 1935, when President Roosevelt signed the landmark National Labor Relations Act. The heart of the statute, known as Section 7, guarantees employees the right to organize, collectively bargain, and “engage in other concerted activities” for their “mutual aid and protection.” That basically means you’ve got permission to whine about management at a bar without getting canned.

These days, that right also extends to the (often whiny) free-for-all that is social media. In a series of reports and rulings this year, the National Labor Relations Board clarified that you are indeed entitled to log onto Facebook or Twitter and gripe about your employer without facing retribution.

There is one case that helps explain it all: 

Of course, all rights have their limitations, and this one is no exception, as attorney Philip Gordon explained in an interview with Bloomberg Businessweek this week. Gordon relates the fascinating case of Knauz BMW, the moral of which is this: If you’re determined to make fun of your company, keep your lacerating wit focused on stuff involving your actual job.

Here are the facts of the case, as Gordon realtes them: Knauz BMW, a dealership outside Chicago, decided to throw a soiree of sorts for its customers, and management thought it would be fun to roll out a hot dog cart for the party. Its sales team argued — to no avail — that an event full of luxury-car owners needed a classier menu, and when the day came, a salesman named Robert Becker snapped some photos of the cart and loaded them onto Facebook “along with snide comments,” as Gordon puts it.

Unfortunately, Becker’s snarking didn’t stop there. Knauz BMW was part of a chain of family-owned franchises that included a Land Rover dealership across the road. In an unfortunate but sort-of-hilarious sounding incident, a customer’s 13-year-old son was allowed into the driver’s seat of a Range Rover and proceeded to barrel the vehicle over a bystander’s foot and into a pond. Becker once again snapped some photos and loaded them onto Facebook alongside his color commentary.

Becker was fired, and his case ended up before the NLRB.

As these cases often do…and then it is a lottery, at least it is in New Zealand.

Here’s Gordon’s explanation of what came next:

Becker contended that he’d engaged in protected concerted activity and shouldn’t have been fired. The NLRB decided that the post about the hot dogs was protected because it was an outgrowth of an earlier meeting with management. But Knauz argued that they’d fired him after the Range Rover incident, which wasn’t protected. It wasn’t a joking matter and it involved a customer. The administrative law judge agreed: The termination was lawful.

So got that? If you rain down vitriol over your employer via Facebook because someone didn’t take your advice on catering, you’re all in the clear. But if you mock the company for stuff that’s entirely unrelated to you, your job conditions, or your coworkers’, you may be packing up your desk. At least, that’s the case for now.


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to Podcasts?
  • Access to Political Polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.

61%