Oh for F*cks Sake!

If I was employing a nanny to look after my kids I’d want them spoken to properly, not sworn at, and I’d want her to drive safely…but the ERA thinks that is ok to do both, swear at children, and drive unsafely.

The irony here is that it appears ok to swear at kids, but you still can’t smack them.

A nanny who was fired after the five children she looked after claimed she swore in front of them and drove too fast has been awarded almost $6000 for unfair dismissal.

In an Employment Relations Authority ruling, member Michael Loftus sided with Kate Fisher, who was dismissed in June 2011 by the children’s mother Carrie O’Brien. 

She had been working as a casual nanny on an “when-required” basis for Ms O’Brien but claimed it was a committed, ongoing arrangement – a point Ms O’Brien disputed.

Ms Fisher worked three or four afternoons a week for the Wanaka family and later took up cleaning duties to earn more money.

However, problems started when the children started complaining “about the way Ms Fisher drove and alleging she swore in their presence”, said the ERA finding.

Ms Fisher was unfairly dismissed because her employer didn’t discuss the issues with her and there was no attempt to find out what happened or why the decision to dismiss was made, Mr Loftus found.

He ordered Ms O’Brien to pay Ms Fisher $1779 in lost wages and $4000 as compensation for humiliation and hurt feelings.

Oh the poor wee thing..hurty feelings…for being sacked…wonder how the family can claim for emotional distress caused by a shouty tart masquerading as a nanny?

Do you want ad-free access to our Daily Crossword?

Do you want access to daily Incite Politics Magazine articles?

Silver Subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.