World’s Best Gun Salesman: Elitist Hypocrite

The world’s best gun salesman isn’t having a good time at the moment, First admitting that fiddling with the Second Amendment may not work, and also having armed guards protecting his daughters who attend a school which is supposedly a gun free “safe zone”.

In December, Obama told Meet The Press he was “skeptical” that placing armed guards in schools was “the only answer” to preventing future shootings like the one at the elementary school in Newtown.

“I think the vast majority of the American people are skeptical that that somehow is going to solve our problem,” Obama told MTP. -source

Now it looks like the anti gun outrage brigade are piping up and getting all upset over the NRA showing up Obama for what he is: an elitist hypocrite. Even NZ taxpayer funded leftie repeaters like Russell Brown are squawking along like a sick parrot running out of seed:  


Why aren’t gun free zones adequate protection for Obama’s kids? If a sign that says “No Guns Allowed Here” won’t work to protect politicians’ kids from nutcase killers, how will that same sign work against deranged killers targeting other kids? Aside from the argument they are higher risk than other children, it is still a valid point. Gun free zones only work for people who abide by the law. Gun free zones take guns away from people who only want to defend themselves and other innocent people. Gun free zones create a shooting gallery for psychopaths with easier targets. Gun free zones take away the ability for the earliest possible first response, instead ten or more minutes waiting for armed police to arrive, analyze the situation and locate the shooter.


What the anti gun lobbyists fail to understand is that the pro gun advocates aren’t arguing for guns in schools as the magic bullet, because there isn’t one and never will be. They are arguing for the best possible chance at an immediate response to the threat of the safety of others, and neutralize it to minimize fatalities.

There’s only one thing gun free zones achieve: making left wing whingers happy by taking away the rights of others to defend themselves under the bullshit charade of creating a safer environment.


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • ratesarerevolting

    Any chance of a sensible debate rather than each side screaming at each other ?

    oh and Len Brown is a fucking cunt !

  • Mighty_Kites

    Despite the repeated failures of armed guards to prevent school shootings. But you, you know, why let the facts get in the way of a good story. Especially when it’s spouted by nutjobs like you

    • Jester

      Repeated failures? I’d like to see that list of repeated failures. For everyone you name I will give you two where concealed weapon permits holders thwarted a tragedy.

    • Travis Poulson

      Unarmed guards are even more useless

      • Mr_Blobby

        Yes. Like some minimum wage Muppet standing outside the local BNZ is going to stop an armed bank robber.

        • Hazards001

          True. But at least he has a job!

  • cows4me

    Of course the pricks are self serving hypocrites but when have they ever been anything but. No Barry will stick with his hired guns but at the same time happily expect others to be moving targets. The hypocrisy on the left is unbelievable. How they expect free citizens to give up their weapons while they parade around armed to the teeth. No citizen with one ounce of common sense would surrender one bullet to these arseholes.

  • Gazzaw

    900+ people killed by guns in the USA since Sandy Hook. Yes, at least 60% will have suicided and yes 2000+ will have been killed on the roads but it’s still good enough reason to take a good balanced look at the existing gun laws. At least give the people the right to express their opinions without the extremists from either side pitching in with their hysteria.

    • Mr_Blobby

      Give one example in NZ of “giving the people the right to express there opinions without the extremist from either side pitching in with their hysteria.” Or simply just ignoring us.

      The smacking debate.
      The MMP debate.
      The same sex marriage debate.

      How about the debate on what and who our TAX/RATES dollars are spent on.

      How about the debate on, what most people consider, our failed justice system.

      How about the debate on our foreign trade policy.

    • onelaw4all

      There is a constitutional amendment process available for that purpose.
      Good luck with that.

    • Dumrse

      What’s the relevant relationship between the numbers killed by guns verses those killed on the roads ?

  • Bovver

    Banning assault weapons is not the same as giving up your guns, learn to tell the difference.

    • Travis Poulson

      banning assault weapons isn’t going to stop shootings, learn to tell the difference.

      • Bovver

        You really are a mouth breather

        • Travis Poulson

          Compelling argument.

    • Dan

      The problem with focusing on banning assault weapons, because of their force-multiplier effect, without actually addressing the wider problems that lead to gun-crime is that it effectively makes an illogical ethical judgement. On the one hand, we’re not prepared to accept the possibility you may killing 20 people with 30 round clip, semi-automatic, but on the other we are comfortable with the possibility you will kill 3-4 people with an old bolt-action.

      The only acceptable number of gun deaths is 0, but banning assault weapons won’t do that. Banning all guns may do that, but it’s highly unlikely to achieve that – besides being against the Constitution.

      • Dumrse

        With the will of the people, the constitution can be changed.

    • DangerMice

      Isn’t the sticking point there that the 2nd Amendment says “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” and by limiting the type of weapon, you are infringing on the right? I don’t know, just what I’ve read.

    • cows4me

      You miss the point Bovver. Just say all assault weapons are banned/confiscated. The government turns feral and seeks to totally disarm the population. Do you think the government, it’s agents will politely come to your door and ask for your guns? Or do you think the government will come to your door armed to the teeth with the latest in arms, including assault weapons? The 2nd amendment was written so the government will fear the people, we get into trouble when it’s the other way around.

      • Mr_Blobby

        Then we are deep in the shit here aren’t we.

        • cows4me

          Oh indeed Mr-Blobby

      • disqus_XQTYMFVKlf

        Doesnt apply to NZ, the media and leftist politicians first dumb the population down and the we are like all “derp :P” and hand our firearms over like good little subjects of the nanny state.

    • onelaw4all

      Define assault weapon, in the context of your proposed ban.

    • disqus_XQTYMFVKlf

      But why stop at assault weapons, next its semi-autos, pistols, mag sizes, bolt actions, certain calibers, we all know the antis are never happy until all guns are gone.