Mad and bad unions holding us to ransom

Rodney Hide takes the NZEI and PPTA to task:

The teacher unions are the most cantankerous in the country. The seamen, the watersiders and the miners are pussycats.

Gone are the days of the ferries going on strike at the start of the school holidays. The freezing workers no longer hold farmers to ransom. The picket that left Mangere Bridge unfinished for two-and-a-half years is now unthinkable.

But the teacher unions? They’re the baddest and the maddest. They dictate education policy, destabilise duly elected ministers of education and present themselves as the arbiters of right and proper schooling.

They’re rich, powerful and unassailable. The New Zealand Educational Institute has 50,000 members and $18 million a year. The Post Primary Teachers’ Association has 17,000 members and $9 million a year. That’s a lot of money. And the teacher unions use it. They think nothing of taking out full-page newspaper ads and hiring commercial billboards to attack the Government.

I’m certain he means mad as in crazy. 

The unions have a larger membership than all political parties combined.

More critically, their members have close contact with mums and dads anxious about little Mary’s education.

That gives the unions an easy and accepting conduit for their propaganda. Mums and dads trust teachers. And mums and dads decide elections.

The assumption that drives their power is that teacher unions are trying to help students. They are not. Their driving concern is their own power and their own budget. To keep their power and budget, the unions must keep their members constantly fired up. Their latest campaign is against the Government’s proposed partnership, or charter, schools. The campaign is complete with union hyperbole, propaganda and wild claims. The PPTA says partnership schools are an attempt to “dismantle New Zealand’s public education system”.

The unions have produced no evidence to support their lies over Charter Schools, but they have a willing and tame media who repeat their lies without asking for evidence.

In fact, the proposal is a little more modest. As it stands, any business or community group can establish a school. What will change is that in areas where there is significant educational challenge and underachievement, a small number of such schools will be taxpayer-funded.

And there’s a catch with the money: the partnership schools must produce results. No results, no money. That doesn’t happen now to any school. New Zealand schools are funded whether or not the students learn anything or, indeed, whether or not they turn up. That won’t be happening with partnership schools.

The teacher unions are apoplectic. Now for a taste of their propaganda. Last year, then-PPTA president Robin Duff said in PPTA News: “Don’t give me partnership schools. The only partnership that matters here is between big money and corrupt Act Party politicians.”

He warns teachers to hang on to their wallets – because millionaire Act Party members want “our” money. I kid you not.

But that’s the union’s message. Evil people are trying to do evil things to you. Quick. Sign up to the union. Pay your fat dues. The union will protect you.

Robin Duff teaches English at Burnside High School. He has done so for 40 years. Words are his business. He wrote his rant as the leader for 17,000 high school teachers. That’s how the union presents itself as the professional face of high-school teachers. The best argument for partnership schools is the teacher unions’ staunch opposition.

The teacher unions will stop at nothing in order to get their way, total and unfettered control of the education system. Their lies would be easily dispatched if only for a questioning media that unfortunately is missing in action.

Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

To read Cam’s previous articles click on his name in blue.