So Obama wants to ban assault weapons? Why doesn’t he do something useful?

In the US there is much talk about banning assault rifles…because they have been used in a few massacres. The proponents ignore the statistics and so when they make wild claims about wanting to prevent gun murders they simply are grandstanding. Especially knobs like Piers Morgan who is crusading against assault rifles yet ignoring the basic facts:

gun_murders

 

Paul Waldman looks at some salient facts

Fully 88 percent of the gun murders for which the kind of gun is identifiable in the records were committed with handguns. Which isn’t surprising at all, given that there are so many of them and that the typical gun murder isn’t a mass shooting committed by a deranged killer, it’s an argument that gets out of hand, a grudge that gets impulsively settled, or a robbery gone wrong. And we don’t know how many of the 300 to 400 murders every year classified as “rifles” are with hunting rifles, or what would be considered assault weapons. So if you’re going to argue that an assault-weapons ban won’t solve our gun problem, you’d be right.

As is often the way with left-wing politicians, it is all about the grandstanding not at all about the substance of the issue.

Will an assault rifle ban make a zak of difference to gun murder in the US…nope, not a single bit of difference. Watch Piers Morgan get angry and throw his notes at his guest after he gets his arse handed to him by a couple of women:


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

To read Cam’s previous articles click on his name in blue.

41%