Australian man in court for shagging ‘Michael Jackson’

First the shark, now the pig, always seems to be the animal’s fault, no matter what the humans do.

Michael Jackson. The other white meat.

A man appears in an Australian court on charges relating to his alleged sexual intercourse with a pet pig called Michael Jackson.

The 35-year-old man appeared in the Darwin Magistrates Court today on the charges of having sexual intercourse with an animal and indecent behaviour in public. 

He has name suppression and his lawyer told the court the man has mental health issues – leading to a request for the charges to be dismissed.

The case was adjourned until later this month.

The pig, is understood to have been shot following the alleged incident in November.

Why was the pig shot? So he couldn’t squeal? Or c ase of once they’ve had human, they want more.

The only question I have is did he put lipstick on the pig?

 


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

Tagged:
  • sandynobb

    It as, as predicted, a slippery slope: first gay marriage; then, human-animal marriage, via zoophilia. But the real issue is, who was wearing the glove?

    • It’s nice to have someone with traditional values. I see you expect them to marry animals before they mate. That’s so conservative of you.

  • “sexual intercourse” it almost implies romance. ITS ANIMAL RAPE!!!!

  • Kacanga

    Oh, the dastardly swine!!

  • steve and monique

    And they call us sheep shaggers.

  • Jack The Ladd

    Bunsen sie das schwein

  • BR

    What a man gets up to with his pet pig is no one else’s business.

    Isn’t that where the bar is set?

    Of course if it were someone else’s pig, there may be some property rights issues.

    Bill.

  • Calandre

    So this wingnut fucks a pig called Michael Jackson. Safe to assume then that this unfortunate porker was a boy – unless it was the victim of mis-nomenclature. But if not, it means the pig got it up the arse – and Michael loses his life. They should have shot the real porker.

40%