Gay Car review knocks $100m of Tesla’s value

Gay car maker Tesla has had $100M knocked from their market capitalisation:

“NEVER pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel,” Mark Twain famously warned. The question is whether that wisdom holds true in the digital age, particularly when the guy picking the fight has a seemingly unlimited supply of electrons.

What’s clear is that Elon Musk is not someone to readily brook criticism. A few years back, for instance, the co-founder of PayPal, an online payment service, and, more recently, the founder of Tesla Motors, a maker of battery-powered cars, went to war with the BBC over a story on the cheeky Top Gear, a wildly popular car show. He ultimately lost.

What’s not clear is who came out on top in Mr Musk’s latest media brawl. This one pitted him against one of the world’s most powerful and influential newspapers, the New York Times. Last month it ran a report by John Broder that detailed his drive from Washington, DC, to Boston in one of the carmaker’s new Model S sedans. What seemed to have short-circuited Mr Musk was a shot showing the electric vehicle being loaded onto a flatbed truck after running out of juice.  

Initially, Mr Musk called the reporter to apologise for the inconvenience. But then he fired off a series of angry tweets, which declared the Times article a “fake”. He insisted that Mr Broder made a number of errors not only in how he handled the drive, but in the subsequent review, touching off an increasingly fractious he-said/she-said flap. Predictably, mainstream media outlets largely sided with the Times, whereas new media and electric-vehicle proponents were more willing to give Tesla the benefit of the doubt.

And how did that turn out? No so well:

In an appearance on Bloomberg TV, he lamented that the well-publicised battle led “a few 100” customers to cancel their orders for the Model S. That would not be a problem considering “they have buyers lined up 10 deep,” in the words of Jim Hall of 2953 Analytics, a market research firm. But the dispute made a big dent in Tesla’s market capitalisation—about $100m, according to Mr Musk.

Yet it was not the only reason for the plunge. The Times story came out just before Tesla reported a loss of $89.9m for the fourth quarter of 2012—a tenth more than in the same period a year earlier. Mr Musk promised that Tesla would claw its way back into the black during the current quarter. Just as potential buyers are left to figure out if the Model S can really live up to its range claims, investors will have to wait to see if Tesla can deliver on its financial numbers.



THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • johnbronkhorst

    The story for the electric car will be the same as “horseless carriage”…when it becomes better, easier to operate, easy to understand etc and the internal combustion engine car is overtaken in these areas…then the battery cars will take over as did the horseless carriage overtake the horse and buggy. The electric car will need, the same or better performance, the same or better performance improvements over time, better styling, longer battery life and shorter recharge times, safety factors (not usually that important). Personally, I wouldn’t have started electric car development in the personal vehicle market, I would have started in the development of commercial vehicles where the criteria are more about form over substance.

    • TomTom

      I don’t believe that the electric car can ever work. It’s just too heavy and consumes too much resources. I think hydrogen is a better way of doing it, as it’s just another way of storing electricity/energy. You can even just combust it instead of having to use a hydrogen fuel cell.

      Even if you aren’t worried about global warming, you have to admit that some day easily-accessible petroleum will run out and that we will need other ways of powering our transportation.

  • Am I the only one thinking that Musk’s “you’re driving it wrong” sounds very much like Job’s “You’re holding it wrong” iPhone 4 antenna issue?

    The biggest point for me is that for electric cars to realistically compete against petrol ones is they need to be able to cope with the “your took an extra turn we didn’t say you could take” (oh, and they need to recharge a lot faster…..)