I bet this teacher was registered when he paid teens to watch them have sex

Teacher unions claim that Charter Schools put kids at risk because there is no requirement for the teachers to be registered.

I’ll bet this guy was registered when he paid two teenagers to let him watch them have sex:

A former Tauranga secondary schoolteacher who paid two teenagers to let him watch them have sex has been sentenced to 100 hours’ community service.

Andrew Loader, 49, who taught at Otumoetai College, was sentenced in the Tauranga District Court today, after earlier pleading guilty to entering into a contract for sexual services with a person under 18. 

Loader agreed to pay a total of $240 to watch an 18-year-old Tauranga youth have sex with his then 16-year-old girlfriend at Loader’s home on two occasions, Sunlive website reported from the police summary of facts.

Loader and the youth – a former Otumoetai College student – communicated by Facebook in November last year, arranging that Loader would pay $120 to watch the couple.

The couple met Loader on November 3 and November 10, and were paid $120 each time, police said.

The offending came to light after the young man’s mother read what had happened on her son’s Facebook page and contacted police, Sunlive reported.


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • Cadwallader

    This is ultra tacky, but what is the offense? All parties were over the age of consent and seem to have participated willingly. What am I missing?

    • peterwn

      Usually the age of consent is 16 years old, but when money involved (generally prostitution) it is 18 years old. NZ could usefully follow UK’s lead which makes schoolteacher-pupil sexual relations illegal regardless of consent.

      • Cadwallader

        Here he seems to be voyeuristic rather than a participant. Isn’t this akin to watching a film of them fucking?

        • blokeintakapuna

          A particularly vivid 3D film indeed.

        • mike

          I would say it is the principle of the whole thing… he is a teacher, entrusted with the care of the students. This is an abuse of trust.

          • Cadwallader


        • peterwn

          See S22 Prostitution Reform Act:

          The teacher fell foul of s22 as interpreted by the court.

          incidentally “voyeuristic” involvement in illegal sex could be sufficient for prosecution for being ‘party’ to the offence – s66 Crimes Act – and the offence could be against any Act. The ‘broomstick boys’ incident being a prime example – the boys present when a broomstick was pushed up a boy’s behind were convicted of being ‘parties’ and went to jail. And it was homosexual reform law which meant they could be charged with sexual violation rather than a serious non-sexual assault charge.

      • cows4me

        Just about over the hill peterwn or they would be if the social engineers of the left had had their way, i believe 14 was mentioned for the age of consent. Oh well in a few years time it will be, we can’t be seen as old fashioned.

  • Gazzaw

    I don’t suppose he was moonlighting as a Catholic priest as well?

  • It’s little wonder normal blokes don’t enter teaching. You’d be presumed to be a fiddler. There are many fantastic blokes in the profession. One of my most memorable was a bloke. Sadly in a world where boys need more strong male role models at school than ever before, this sort of shit, and the scum fiddlers up north would turn many fine males away in fear. Scum.