If you’re dodgy, don’t own a smartphone

 

via onlineincometeacher.com

via onlineincometeacher.com

Timothy B. Lee at Ars Technica reveals

The [US] courts have traditionally allowed the police to inspect any items a suspect is carrying when they arrest him or her. But in the past, the information the police could obtain in this fashion was fairly limited. The advent of the smartphone has changed all that.  

A new document uncovered by the ACLU provides insight into just how aggressive law enforcement agencies have become about obtaining the contents of seized cell phones. Last fall, writes the ACLU’s Chris Soghoian, “officers from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) seized an iPhone from the bedroom of a suspect in a drug investigation.”

A document filed in court shows that police extracted a wealth of personal information from the device, including call records, contacts, stored text messages, photos, videos, and passwords. They also obtained “659 geolocation points, including 227 cell towers and 403 Wi-Fi networks with which the cell phone had previously connected”—a detailed record of where the device had been in previous weeks. Soghoian says law enforcement agencies can buy portable devices that extract this kind of information from smartphones in a matter of minutes.

I don’t like the idea of anyone having access to  my smartphone contents, and the police better have a warrant.

It is a complete picture of my life, and provides access to historical data that should have more protection that simply being arrested on suspicion of, anything.

Should Police automatically have access to everything on a phone, merely at the first contact?

While acquiring such a massive volume of data without a warrant may fit the letter of the law, it certainly seems to violate the spirit of the Fourth Amendment. Until recently, no one would have had that much personal information in their pockets. Such records, if they existed at all, would have been in the suspect’s home, where the police couldn’t seize it without a warrant.

Unfortunately, law enforcement groups have resisted efforts to enhance cell phone privacy in these situations.

Some legal decisions are coming from US where the Police need a warrant if access to the phone is restricted with a password.  But that’s still a lame protection.  It would be similar to not needing a warrant to enter and search your home as long as they found a door unlocked.

What does your smartphone reveal about you?  And what, if anything, are you doing to protect your data if it was to fall in the wrong hands?


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

To read Cam’s previous articles click on his name in blue.

38%