Open Mic: Addressing the misinformation campaign of Family First, by Kevin Hague

Capture

Most MP inboxes are again starting to fill up with lobbying emails and letters again on the Marriage Equality Bill. I wouldn’t call it a flood, but there’s a steady stream.

Most of those opposed have introduced a curious new note: they are terrified or outraged that the words “husband” and “wife” are going to be outlawed, or at least expunged from the NZ Statute book. They think this because Family First has done its usual scare-mongering and exaggeration trick, making this their main response to the Select Committee report released this week.

This fear that the language in NZ law was going to be changed was something that appeared in a very small number of submissions, but Family First is making a big deal of it now because the Select Committee has made it absolutely clear that churches won’t be required to do or say anything different, making religious freedom a non-issue.

I have to say I’m tempted to respond by asking which legal reference to “husband” and “wife” is their favourite, as I’m quite certain that my correspondents have only the vaguest notion of what’s actually in the law, but that might be unhelpful. 

kevinhague

Kevin Hague MP

Of course Louisa’s Bill will affect some other laws if it is passed. In fact in a large majority of cases where NZ law needs to refer to the partners in a marriage it uses the terms “spouse” and “spouses” already. I haven’t noticed people marching in the streets to change this! These laws won’t require any change.

In the minority of cases where “husband” and “wife” are used, the Select Committee’s instruction has been that if it is possible to retain them, and for the law to still make sense once same-sex couples can marry, then that is what should happen. The words have been retained in about three quarters of the places they currently appear.

In the remaining quarter of cases a change is needed to make the law make sense. For example where the law says “the husband and wife” must do a particular thing the wording cannot be intelligibly applied to same-sex married couples. In these cases we have replaced with “both spouses” rather than invent some extraordinarily cumbersome alternative.

I think most people would conclude that Family First is clutching at straws. But shame on them for doing so in a way that misleads and panics others.

Authorized by Kevin Hague, Parliament Buildings, Wellington.

Open Mic is where you get to have a say to the Whaleoil audience.  Anyone can submit an Open Mic article by emailing [email protected]  Keep your articles to 300-700 words, and please write for this audience  Submitted articles will be posted anonymously unless you ask us clearly to do otherwise (that way no mistakes get made). 


Do you want ad-free access to our Daily Crossword?

Do you want access to daily Incite Politics Magazine articles?

Silver Subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.

39%