The answer is in the denial

Chris Trotter writes about the ongoing coup taking shape within Labour.

The maelstrom of criticism into which Mr Garner has been unceremoniously pitched, since his predictions of last Thursday night were proved wrong, provides the strongest argument as to why he would not have tweeted without feeling extremely confident about the rumour’s veracity. (Just to make sure, however, he sought and received confirmation from a second Labour Party source.)

Two confirmed sources is not a rumour it is a fact. Garner…and Twitter just made the transmission of the fact quicker than the plotters were ready to act.

That Mr Garner was given what the Americans call “a bum steer” should tell him (and us) that the atmosphere in Labour’s Caucus is becoming increasingly toxic. And, as Julia Gillard would no doubt confirm, such a poisoned political environment makes rumours of an imminent leadership spill both inevitable and believable.  

There are so many factions in Labour, they are at each toehr’s throat, and the unhelpful introduction of the ‘man ban’ merely exasperated some of those factions.

So, why did Mr Garner’s coup rumour fail to stack up? Let’s go through the explanatory options.

1) Some sort of leadership coup was on, but Mr Garner’s tweet alerted Mr Shearer’s supporters and the organisers were forced to abort. (Despairing Labour MPs may simply have been gathering sufficient signatures to persuade their leader to go gracefully and preserve the party from a debilitating civil war.)

2) No coup was imminent, but Mr Garner’s source considered it vital that Mr Shearer be forced to endure yet another destabilising round of media speculation concerning the viability of his leadership. (So vital that they were willing to abuse and lose Mr Garner’s trust.)

3) For reasons of their own, Mr Shearer’s backers decided to undermine Mr Garner’s journalistic credibility by deliberately misinforming him that a coup was underway.

Each of these explanations offers a slightly different take on the dire state of affairs within the Labour Caucus. Underlying all of them, however, is the undeniable fact of a leader (and the faction backing that leader) under extraordinary and unremitting pressure.

Mr Garner’s prediction may have failed to materialise, but it did, at least, remind us of Bismarck’s famous quip: “Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.”

And of course Grant Robertson has been at pains to official deny the existence of both the letter and a coup plot. Perhaps Bismarck, Garner and Trotter are right.


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • Sir Cullen’s Sidekick

    I am so happy that Puff Pastry Garner’s credibility has been shredded to pieces. He is a left wing Labour and Greens supporter and to see him look like an idiot is priceless. There is no coup, nothing – FULL STOP. Sheep will lead Labour to victory in 2014 election.

  • Euan Ross-Taylor

    I am amused that Robertson had to check the caucus first to be sure the rumours were false – therefore validating them.

  • Dave

    The question, is not if, but which day Shearer will be rolled, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday, Tuesday. Garner got his powder wet too soon, but I’m happy to predict Shearer will be rolled on a day ending with Y.

  • cows4me

    What’s Labia polling at the moment, somewhere in the twenties? Whether Garner was given a bum steer or not who really cares except Mr Trotter. Obviously Mumbles days in the sun are numbered. Mr Trotter should be talking up the next lunatic faction to run the asylum, what will it be queer, union or far left fruitcakes?

  • IWantToBeLikeMallardOneDay

    What a pack of spineless pussies the labour party are. If they want him gone, he should take the hint, or they should walk up to Shearer and say, “David, you suck, we want to replace you.”