Rock Star Teachers

Obviously this article won’t be about any teachers in New Zealand, though there are surely bound to be some that deserve the sort of title and rewards that come from such a title.

In enlightened countries, where the teacher unions are non-existent and performance garners rewards there certainly are rock star teachers and they earn a significant amount of coin for their efforts.

Kim Ki-hoon earns $4 million a year in South Korea, where he is known as a rock-star teacher—a combination of words not typically heard in the rest of the world. Mr. Kim has been teaching for over 20 years, all of them in the country’s private, after-school tutoring academies, known as hagwons. Unlike most teachers across the globe, he is paid according to the demand for his skills—and he is in high demand.

Mr. Kim works about 60 hours a week teaching English, although he spends only three of those hours giving lectures. His classes are recorded on video, and the Internet has turned them into commodities, available for purchase online at the rate of $4 an hour. He spends most of his week responding to students’ online requests for help, developing lesson plans and writing accompanying textbooks and workbooks (some 200 to date).

“The harder I work, the more I make,” he says matter of factly. “I like that.” 

With an attitude like that the PPTA would black list him in a heart beat. Perish the thought that similar behaviours take root in our education system.

I traveled to South Korea to see what a free market for teaching talent looks like—one stop in a global tour to discover what the U.S. can learn from the world’s other education superpowers. Thanks in part to such tutoring services, South Korea has dramatically improved its education system over the past several decades and now routinely outperforms the U.S. Sixty years ago, most South Koreans were illiterate; today, South Korean 15-year-olds rank No. 2 in the world in reading, behind Shanghai. The country now has a 93% high-school graduation rate, compared with 77% in the U.S.

Results focused, performance related.

The idea is seductive: Teaching well is hard, so why not make it lucrative? Even if American schools will never make teachers millionaires, there are lessons to be learned from this booming educational bazaar, lessons about how to motivate teachers, how to captivate parents and students and how to adapt to a changing world.

To find rock-star teachers like Mr. Kim, hagwon directors scour the Internet, reading parents’ reviews and watching teachers’ lectures. Competing hagwons routinely try to poach one another’s celebrity tutors. “The really good teachers are hard to retain—and hard to manage. You need to protect their egos,” says Lee Chae-yun, who owns a chain of five hagwons in Seoul called Myungin Academy.

The most radical difference between traditional schools and hagwons is that students sign up for specific teachers, so the most respected teachers get the most students. Mr. Kim has about 120 live, in-person students per lecture, but a typical teacher’s hagwon classes are much smaller. The Korean private market has reduced education to the one in-school variable that matters most: the teacher.

And the market handles quality, no registration in Korea. If a teacher is tits they go broke.

It is about as close to a pure meritocracy as it can be, and just as ruthless. In hagwons, teachers are free agents. They don’t need to be certified. They don’t have benefits or even a guaranteed base salary; their pay is based on their performance, and most of them work long hours and earn less than public school teachers.

The parents want and demand this too.

Performance evaluations are typically based on how many students sign up for their classes, their students’ test-score growth and satisfaction surveys given to students and parents. “How passionate is the teacher?” asks one hagwon’s student survey—the results of which determine 60% of the instructor’s evaluation. “How well-prepared is the teacher?” (In 2010, researchers funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation found classroom-level surveys like this to be surprisingly reliable and predictive of effective teaching in the U.S., yet the vast majority of our schools still don’t use them.)

“Students are the customers,” Ms. Lee says. To recruit students, hagwons advertise their results aggressively. They post their graduates’ test scores and university acceptance figures online and outside their entrances on giant posters. It was startling to see such openness; in the U.S., despite our fetish for standardized testing, the results remain confusing and hard to interpret for parents.

Once students enroll, the hagwon embeds itself in families’ lives. Parents get text messages when their children arrive at the academies each afternoon; then they get another message relaying students’ progress. Two to three times a month, teachers call home with feedback. Every few months, the head of the hagwon telephones, too. In South Korea, if parents aren’t engaged, that is considered a failure of the educators, not the family.

Failure to perform has predictable results.

If tutors get low survey marks or attract too few students, they generally get placed on probation. Each year, Ms. Lee fires about 10% of her instructors. (By comparison, U.S. schools dismiss about 2% of public school teachers annually for poor performance.)

All of this pressure creates real incentives for teachers, at least according to the kids. In a 2010 survey of 6,600 students at 116 high schools conducted by the Korean Educational Development Institute, Korean teenagers gave their hagwon teachers higher scores across the board than their regular schoolteachers: Hagwon teachers were better prepared, more devoted to teaching and more respectful of students’ opinions, the teenagers said. Interestingly, the hagwon teachers rated best of all when it came to treating all students fairly, regardless of the students’ academic performance.

 


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • Chiefsfan73

    Awesome

  • Michael

    “Each year, Ms. Lee fires about 10% of her instructors. (By comparison, U.S. schools dismiss about 2% of public school teachers annually for poor performance.)”

    In NZ, I would be surprised if it is 0.02% per annum dismissed for poor performance if you exclude those who are arrested.

  • NeillR

    This is why Labour wants a #ChanBan. If they keep allowing them to immigrate at some point good ideas like this will become law and the NZEI won’t be around to pay all those $$ into Labour’s coffers.

  • Col

    Taiwan teacher, school starts at 8am finish 4pm that’s for primary school, some or most will go to after school extra work until 7pm?
    I love Asian workers, that is one word they understand and we as English speaking don’t. WORK what makes the world go round.

    • IWantToBeLikeMallardOneDay

      Their views on education are crazy, but they’re only slightly less crazy than the NZEI’s.
      You need to come to Asia and see its effect before you take this in. It is better than NZ, but it has a LOT of flaws.

      • Col

        Tell me what has no flaws and I will show you perfection?
        Know one young bloke in Taiwan, just wants to be the outdoor type, so he would do well in NZ and maybe Queenstown, just not Uni minded.
        I look at PRC as being less demanding than Taiwan?

        • IWantToBeLikeMallardOneDay

          The job is a profession and the means of improving upon it is academic. Taiwan is a much better deal financially, but if you want an easy job then come to China and make a nice “living wage” working 15-20 per weeks for 7000+rmb per month.
          The students have to rote learn grammatical clauses and they are tested based on multi-choices of four possible outcomes. The people who get into college are all rainmen. Loads of Obamas too.
          The problem is that the NZ curriculum is actually superior, but the personnel providing the education are found severely wanting due to their entitlement mentality.

          • Col

            About 5 or 6 years ago I was asked to spend a week on and a week off for a period of 6 weeks with a corporate company just out of Beijing just talking on day today conversation in the English speaking work place, it was good money they offered.
            I spent a bit of time in Beijing plus Shanghai, back that way this January2014.

          • IWantToBeLikeMallardOneDay

            I’ll be in Shijiazhung. Hit me up! :-)

          • Col

            I may visit the Great Wall Wine co Ltd, so you never know, your not in that business are you? That cab sav or they call it Dry Red I think,it is not bad, have you tried it?

    • IWantToBeLikeMallardOneDay

      Their views on education are crazy, but they’re only slightly less crazy than the NZEI’s.
      You need to come to Asia and see its effect before you take this in. It is better than NZ, but it has a LOT of flaws.

  • Orange

    Love it. Makes so much sense to have a best equipped and resourced studio record the best teacher on video. Students watch the lessons then come to class for questions and tutorials – not basic content. The future of education is there.

    • DLNZ

      Its known as “flipping the classroom”. Kids get more one on one time (which teachers are always moaning about not having enough of). There are a few places doing it here but it relies on kids having access to the internet and a computer. Not surprisingly the biggest obstacle is teachers. More work initially, and means Mum and Dad can now watch a video of how appalling little Johnny’s teacher is at doing their job. And when kids start succeeding they can no longer blame class sizes.

  • IWantToBeLikeMallardOneDay

    There’s a lot you’ve yet to learn about education in Asia. Parents want results, but many of them lack the means for discerning just what precisely those results are. For example, in Korea, there is reading and there is reading comprehension. Korean kids can recite a text like clockwork and can identify grammatical errors immediately. They spend ten hours a day doing it so of course they can. But their comprehension is 0%, no exaggeration, I swear.
    If you gave them a sentence such as, “my brother swims when it is warm.” They cannot discern whether that means “he swims every time it is warm”, or “if it happens to be warm, my brother swims” or even “swimming makes my brother feel warm”
    Because of the tradition value of “education” all over Asia and the size of the populations of these countries. A lot of people can make a lot of money supposedly educating children when really they are just sending them hope with a few phrases and tricks which you just as well might teach polly in the birdcage.
    This is what results based education is. A few generations will sort out the skewered heuristics which the parents are functioning on.
    It is cruel to the kids and they are not smarter for it, contrary to what teachers will say about it being nicer to teach them. It is nicer to teach them, but they’re getting fucked over. They deserve better.

52%