Peace in our time? Not bloody likely

The last person who declared that peace was breaking out has forever been ridiculed throughout history for his silly claims.

David Cunliffe has claimed that peace is breaking out in Labour…and that they were going on a war footing. Silly stuff really, and the sort of rhetoric we are all going to get sick of hearing, especially when it is bollocks.

If the information flowing to my tipline is an indicator then they have never been more at war…with each other.

Are the cracks already showing in Labour’s new-found unity?

The rank and file may have spoken in overwhelmingly backing David Cunliffe as the new leader – but the jury is still out on whether the caucus faction that backed his rival Grant Robertson has accepted the verdict.

The best start to Mr Cunliffe’s week would have been appearing with Mr Robertson at his side yesterday as his new deputy.

Instead, that job went to finance spokesman David Parker. That left Mr Cunliffe and Mr Robertson fumbling over explanations as to whether the job was ever offered, or would have been accepted if offered. 

There was plenty of murk yesterday surrounding who said what behind closed doors. But it was Mr Cunliffe who had most to gain from offering Mr Robertson the deputy leadership, and Mr Robertson who had most to lose from accepting it.

Two of our most successful prime ministers, Helen Clark and John Key, both forged caucus unity by doing deals with their rivals. The symbolism of following in their footsteps would not have been lost on Cunliffe.

Camp Cunliffe were in no doubt following Sunday’s election that a Cunliffe-Robertson ticket was the dream team. More than symbolism was at stake – throwing his support behind Cunliffe would have been a signal to Mr Robertson’s supporters that he would act as a unifying force.

The failure to secure that outcome will only give fuel to speculation that he and his supporters instead expect to live to fight another day.

I think it is a good move…for Robertson. He ca toil away in the house, get plenty of coverage, which is why Trevor Mallard loved the job, and when the wheels fall off Cunliffe and Parker he can claim righteously that it wasn’t him wot done it….it was them, they were running the ship…the skipper and his pal.

If the deputy leadership was a lost opportunity for symbolism, Cunliffe’s first head-to-head battle with Prime Minister John Key was another. In a sign of how heavily caucus headaches had been weighing on his mind, Cunliffe’s usual polish deserted him and he muffed his questions to Key not just once but twice.

That won’t upset his supporters too much; even on a bad day Cunliffe’s sure-footedness in the job is a marked contrast to his predecessor David Shearer.

Cunliffe has bitten off more than most with his leadership – he comes into the job in the unprecedented situation of leading without the backing of a majority of caucus.

But his unceremonious dumping of Leader of the House Trevor Mallard yesterday suggests he will use his overwhelming mandate from the wider party to push through change regardless.

If Cunliffe really is set on humiliating Trevor Mallard, who has had more dumpings than a rubbish truck, then he should take sport off of him and give him spokesman for disabilities.


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to Podcasts?
  • Access to Political Polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.

41%