Will Labour’s new leader have the courage to do this?

After being voted in by union power on Sunday I wonder if the new Labour leader will have the courage that Ed Miliband has shown in staring down the unions.

Ed Miliband will raise the stakes in his battle with the trade unions on Tuesday by declaring that his plans to reform Labour’s union links could create a party with 500,000 members.

In a speech to the TUC conference, the Labour leader will confront his critics head-on, accusing union leaders of denying their members the “real voice” in the party that his plans would give them. He wants to make them actively “opt in” to Labour as individuals, instead of being affiliated en bloc by their union as at present.

“We have three million working men and women affiliated to our party. But the vast majority play no role. They are affiliated in name only,” Mr Miliband will tell the Brighton conference. “That wasn’t the vision of [Labour’s] founders. I don’t think it’s your vision either. And it’s certainly not my vision.” 

His unrepentant message threatens to raise tensions with union bosses, with whom he will hold private talks today. Labour MPs claim the speech is a critical element of Mr Miliband’s attempts to restore his authority after what has been a difficult summer.

Affliates are undemocratic and need to be resisted. If I was in government I would ban affiliate membership of political parties, I would ensure that onlynatural persons could be members.

I would also address donations from non-natural persons. Fiji has now introduced such a ban on donations. Only natural persons can donate to political parties, blocking unions and companies from attempting to buy a political party.

Will labour’s new leader have such courage. Not likely.

Union leaders fear Mr Miliband’s plan will weaken the party’s links with its union founders. But senior Labour figures suspect union bosses want to preserve their personal clout. They welcomed a YouGov poll for the Labour Uncut blog, revealed in The Independent yesterday, showing 60 per of the members of Labour-affiliated unions welcome the reforms and only 20 per cent oppose them. “It shows… hundreds of thousands are excited by the prospect of their voice being heard by a major political party,” said a Labour source.

Confront the unions, they are a cancer on the body politic.


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • blokeintakapuna

    Cancerous, gangrene, rotten to the core, inept, bereft of ideas and more corrupt than what we know with what they’ve demonstrated in numerous instances with numerous individual MP’s over many years… And that’s the nicest things I could say about them.

  • johnbronkhorst

    Labour are the political wing of the unions. Labour was created by the unions for this purpose. Cutting ties with unions, is not like cutting the umbilical cord, more like cutting your own throat! The unions will fight to keep the influence over THEIR creation and if that fails will create a new party to oppose them!
    Todays labour party, will cease to exist, starved of funds and union mussel.

    • Dr Wang

      – not to mention oysters, and caviar…

  • Whafe

    NZ Labour see it as simple as not wanting to bite the hand that feeds them. In order for that to happen, that would mean Labour would have to accept the fact they are Broke, no unity, full of factions etc etc and cannot survive without massive changes, so need the scum unions…

  • Honcho

    I see it as a healthy move for not only the party, but also for the failing union movement, who doesn’t want a party that actually listens to its membership over pandering to special interest groups who have weaselled their way into a position of influence?

    Its the same problem here, there is absolutely nothing wrong with the idea of unionised labour, there is however something very very wrong with their bosses (how the heck can you have two bosses, one who pays you and one you pay??) and the way they structure the workers unions to support their own selfish ends.

  • Garbageman

    Labour party are the same as Facebook 3 million friends and no likes

  • nudgy

    As you have quite rightly said in the past Whale – imagine the bleating from the left if Federated farmers had a say in who could be the National Party leader. What a bunch of fuckwits the lefty green commie wankers are.