Surprise, surprise David Bain’s camp objects to reports despite being involved at all steps

Michael Reed QC continues the crusade to hurl murk against Robin Bain in an attempt to score big time in the compensation stakes.

He is claiming that the police report into the marks on the thumb and finger of Robin Bain. This despite being included in forensic review.

Michael Reed of course ran off to their pals and enablers at TV3 to spread their story.

He repeats the outrageous claims that the marks line up exactly with the feed lips of the magazine. The Police, like my reader showed this to be demonstrably false.

Mr Reed says this conflicts with not only the opinions of independent experts spoken to by 3rd Degree, but also those of Dr Alexander Dempster, who did the original examination of Robin’s body.

Dr Dempster said in August there were no cuts or abrasions on Robin’s hands at all.

“Start with the black marks that are there,” says Mr Reed. “We know they’re there, everyone can see them. Suddenly the police now say, when they look at it in the morgue, that they’re superficial. Well, where have the black marks gone? 

“We know [they disappeared] because the police – in their inept investigation – rubbed the marks off by not wrapping the hands.”

The police report doesn’t rule out that the marks could be gun residue, but Mr Burgess says the likelihood is “very remote”. Mr Reed says the police should allow an independent investigation of the evidence by overseas experts.

“I challenge Mr Burgess to come on here with TV3 and face me or [prominent David Bain supporter] Joe Karam, and be questioned on the right questions and answers,” says Mr Reed. “I challenge him, and I also challenge him to have an overseas investigation by independent experts, not their own.”

Note the phrasing…ignoring all the evidence that the marks weren’t residue but abrasions or cuts. He bizarrely asks why the black marks were rubbed off…uhmmm..they weren’t black marks they were cuts, and you can’t rub those off…only in their fantasy are the black marks “rubbed off”.

Then note the bullying challenge to come on TV and debate with Michael Reed and Joe Karam…these guys are just show boating.

They are now questions forensics and firearms experts…and the quite obvious details of the research…all of which they were part of at every step of the way.

Now that the report, which they were part of doesn’t produce the results that morons at 3rd Degree claimed they are now mounting a full court press against the report with the compliant media.

We are now starting to see the problems when media invest themselves in a story or angle.


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to Podcasts?
  • Access to Political Polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.

61%