Charitable status of Greenpeace now impossible


The more I think about it the more I think that the Green Taliban supporters puppet-masters Greenpeace are dreaming if they think they’ve got a chance in hell of securing charitable status again after this shocking revelation.

In a move straight out of the NSA training handbook, Greenpeace activists have more interest in gathering the contact details of citizens who get bullied into signing petitions by charity muggers.

Greenpeace activists then use this personal information to call up the housewives of Mt Eden to demand money donations from them.

But those Mt Eden housewives certainly won’t be happy campers when their husbands come home from work and tell them Greenpeace is using this money to pay hippies to solicit money out of petition signers all so they can pay dividends to their overseas corporate entities. 

Even travel blogger David Farrar has a crack at them saying;

“Their parliamentary wing does much the same thing. The main reason the Greens spent tens of thousands of (taxpayers) dollars paying people to collect petition signatures wasn’t to actually have a referendum, but to harvest e-mail addresses for their database”.

The move has been labelled “invasive, unethical and a possible breach of privacy”. They also have the cheek to seek charitable status in NZ all the while attacking legitimate businesses that actually employ people, pay wages, taxes and give employees that chance to get ahead.

Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore certainly doesn’t think they deserve charitable status. I’m with Patrick.

Do you want:

  • ad-free access?
  • access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • access to Incite Politics magazine articles?

Silver subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March.

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.