Dodgy union ratbags kill jobs

The unions are doing their best to root things up for their workers at the Boeing factory in Seattle. Like the Holden and Ford workers of Australia they have progressively made life too difficult for life to continue on the way it has been.

The unions now have choices…come to agreement and save some jobs or down tools and watch the jobs move elsewhere.

The Seattle Times Editorial is blunt.

MEMBERS of the Machinists union voting Friday on a revised Boeing contract offer must look ahead. The operative word is pragmatism, not nostalgia.

This is about long-term employment to build the 777X and carbon-fiber wing in Washington, and for final assembly of the 737 MAX.

Friday’s vote comes at the insistence of the International Association of Machinists’ leadership in Washington, D.C. A second vote after last month’s contract rejection was strongly resisted by Puget Sound-area IAM District 751.

In urging rank-and-file members to turn down the latest offer, local union leaders noted online:

“District 751 is recommending you reject the Company’s latest proposal because the terms of this agreement are destructive to what we have gained over the past 78 years.” The union has indeed served its members well for decades.   

But how many more decades? Not many if any if the union bosses have their way.

Boeing and its employees shared a long journey from the Great Depression, and through World War II production, and subsidized technology gains transferred to civilian airliners. They were joint beneficiaries of lucrative federal contracts.

Boeing and all the unions prospered through decades with effectively no competition as European and Asian economies rebuilt themselves from the rubble of war.

Union members built planes with an earned and well-deserved reputation for quality. Those skills and values persist and define the opportunity the company has in Puget Sound for decades to come.

But in those 78 years cited by the union, the global economy has changed, dramatically. Boeing has European and Asian competitors and collaborators.

The worldwide manufacturing economy is all about the mobility of assets, technology and means of production. Boeing has options that did not exist a generation ago.

The United States is not the only place manufacturing can be done…the union bosses need to grasp that.

Union members on Friday are not voting about what was negotiable and sustainable decades ago. They are weighing long-term employment, and — for many other workers in the economy — an enviable and unapproachable package of benefits and wages.

Boeing and its union employees build solid airplanes, but neither side has any demonstrated skills as gamblers.

Union strikes clouded by arrogant assumptions put the company in the mood to look around for assembly sites in nonunion states. Bungling management decisions about 787 outsourcing will be studied in MBA classes forever.

Union leadership cannot assume that rejecting the contract is a smart bet because Boeing really, really wants to stay in Puget Sound. The company has shown a capacity to act against its own self-interest at spectacular expense to its reputation and bottom line.

The state of Washington has tied $8 billion in tax largesse to Boeing staying in place. Another reason for pragmatism on management’s side of the table.

Boeing success in Washington and the quality work of its employees is not about nostalgia. The corporate reputation is tested every day on the plant floor and with every order that is filled.

Union workers voting Friday, in person and via absentee ballots, are voting about the future — their own and Boeing’s in Puget Sound.

No guessing, no gambling, no nostalgia. This vote is about economic realities in 2014, and the decades ahead.

My bet is that like the stupid Port workers in Auckland they will simply follow their union bosses directives and then march on down to the unemployment lines.

Do you want:

  • ad-free access?
  • access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • access to Incite Politics magazine articles?

Silver subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March.

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.