Is homosexuality a kind of “sexual dyslexia”?

Interesting what you can find on the last day of 2013.  Have a look at this:


My first reaction was “eugenics is alive and well”, but then I noticed the Ph.D. bit.  Can this be dismissed, or is this hard scientific data that we simply can’t speak of in public?  

One reader reviews the book

I have received your inquiry if I might write a testimonial for your book Two Human Species Exist. After a day of fuming about the audacity of such a request, I have once again taken up the book this time with a severely critical eye.
To my amazement I have now concluded that the book is a brilliant “must read” for everyone in modern Psychology !
In hindsight this is not surprising since you first came to attention when Sybil Eysenck and Tony Vernon, coeditors of the research journal, Personality and Individual Differences, put their imprimatur on your historic 2010 MRI paper Brain Laterality Advance: Neuroanatomical evidence for Hemisity (Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 34-42).
Now I find, in rereading Two Human Species Exist, which is an expanded treatise on Hemisity, that of all things, “crossed” Brain Hemisity appears to be the long sought for biological explanation of Homosexuality ! After explaining that the left-brained offspring of left-brained parents are particularly prone to a “crossover defect” similar to dyslexia, in utero, in which one fails to develop normal sexual identity. Instead a
“crossed” sexual identity occurs, a sort of “sexual dyslexia”, and that homosexuality is the result” On page 185 you say:

“This is the first mechanism to adequately describe the inherent origin and existence of homosexuality”
(Morton, Two Human Species Exist, p. 185)

I was stunned. No one in 10,000 years of recorded history has ever been able to figure out what homosexuality is… not Sigmund Freud… not even the Vatican has a clue what causes it ! Now we find out that it is a form of “crossed brain lateralization, a sexual dyslexia”

Surely this book is God’s Gift to Colin Craig’s election campaign?

The author says

Recently, it has been found that everyone is either right (R) or left (L) brain oriented person and that these Hemisity “opposites attract” 2/3s of the time. From this it can be seen that there are two human species. In Homo sapiens matripolaris, a right brained female is the family leader and a left brained male gives her support (RF-LM). In the other species, Homo sapiens patripolaris, a right brained male is the family leader and a left brained female gives him support (RM-LF).
There are two cross breed possibilities, each of which produce miswired hybrid ofspring.
If a RM-RF couple cross-breed, their RP hybrid children are dyslexics, their LP children are tran-heterosexuals.  If a LM-LF couple-cross breed, their hybrid childern often are cis- or trans-homosexuals. If certain hybrids themselves cross-breed, their hybrid offspring can be pedophiles or schizophrenics. Thus, all these anomalies are due to incompatible gene pairing resulting in central nervous system crossover failures in the second trimester of pregnancy in hybrids. Thus, there are no dyslexia genes, gay genes, or schizophrenia genes.

One way or the other, explosively controversial.

Moon landing, chemtrails and now a scientific basis for homosexuality.  Knock your socks off Colin.


Source: Amazon

Do you want:

  • ad-free access?
  • access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • access to Incite Politics magazine articles?

Silver subscriptions and above go in the draw to win a $500 prize to be drawn at the end of March.

Not yet one of our awesome subscribers? Click Here and join us.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story.  And when he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet.   Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet, and as a result he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist that takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him.  But you can’t ignore him.