Photo Of The Day

A real game changer : The raccoon coat.

A real game changer : The raccoon coat.

Fur “Pimp Coat” Craze

Man has worn fur since he was living in a cave, but there’s something about this photograph and the men, all “pimped-out” in full-length fur that stopped me in my tracks. I had stumbled upon a snapshot of a moment in fashion history when American Ivy league-ers and young college undergrads began sporting heavy, full-length raccoon coats, which set the trend in 1920s & 30s men’s fashion and sparked a voracious demand for the extravagant garment across the country. If a man could afford a fur coat, he had one; bankers, salesmen and students alike used the style to signify or improve their social status.

And if you were a Ivy League undergrad in the 1920s with a reputation to keep, you wouldn’t have been seen at the homecoming game without one…

The trend allegedly emerged as a result of Davy Crockett mania and popular interest by an elite group of young Americans in his stories. It spread even further by popular big band music jazz musicians embraced by the students who sang about the Ivy-league fur fad.

The Ivy league-ers of the decade wore these coats predominately pitch-side for the cold matches whilst watching the varsity teams. Raccoon fur was the choice of students and spectators, which saw a strong demand for it well into the mid 30’s.

In 1935, the leading men’s fashion magazine Men’s Wear reported: “The raccoon coat is back in fashion. More were seen at the climax football games in the East this season than at any time in the past ten years. The best style, worn by undergraduates and alumni alike, is very dark in color, has a shawl collar and usually hefty leather buttons”.

These coats fell into decline as the world went into war and the depression set in. Time passed and the economy slowly revived itself and by the 1950s fur was falling back into the reach of the American middle class and college go-ers alike. The alumni of the roaring 20’s had now grown up and were handing their wears down to their sons to sport as they had once done.

By the 1970s, public awareness of fur had evolved (due to the ill-treatment of the animals), and many questioned the necessity of garments, in order to keep the style alive fake fur was advertised more heavily. Since then fictional and non-fictional fur has been tabooed and those that wear it are predominantly female.

http://retrospectivemodernism.wordpress.com/2013/12/04/a-real-game-changer-the-raccoon-coat/
 


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • Damon Mudgway

    Always facinates me that people are generally okay with eating animals but have an issue with wearing their fur. I mean seriously, we wear their skin.

    • Whitey

      Me too. I understand vegetarians objecting to fur/leather, but I don’t see the logic from a carnivore’s point of view.

    • johcar

      Just playing Devil’s Advocate here, but, typically, the animals we eat (mmmmm, meat!) are not the same animals we harvest furry skins from.

      Fur is generally sourced from carnivorous mammals – and humans (who are omnivores) don’t eat a lot of carnivores.

  • DangerMice

    Dude on the left looks like he’s in his dressing gown

  • Nige.

    Interesting to think about how networking was done back in those days nearly a hundred years ago.

    Back when a “blog” was called “news”.

52%