Photo Of The Day


Photo: Supplied

Photo: Supplied

Journalist T-Shirt With Famous Headline Deemed ‘Offensive’ by Parliament Security

What began as a lazy jog around Parliament House has ended in a stoush over the right to offend in the halls of Australia’s home of democracy.

Earlier today two press gallery journalists from The West Australian newspaper pulled on their daggy running gear and set out on their semi-regular lap of Capital Hill.

Either Nick Butterly or Andrew Tillett is likely to win awards for their physical prowess or their sense of style.

Butterly wore a T-shirt emblazoned with the most famous headline ever penned by US tabloid the New York Post, “Headless body in topless bar”.

At the end of their run the two Parliament House pass holders staggered in the main public entrance and passed through the metal detectors.

Butterly tells the story:

A female guard stopped me and asked if she could see my T-shirt.

She said: “I’m sorry sir you will have to take that off. It’s offensive.”

I laughed thinking she was joking and moved to leave. She became quite serious and said I would have to stand in the corner and suggested I might not be able to enter the building.

I explained to her this was a famous tabloid headline and we were newspaper reporters in the gallery.

She said that did not matter and some people might find the shirt offensive. She suggested I would have to turn the shirt inside out and go and change.

Another security guard told her we were pass holders and suggested we be allowed to go inside and change.

She seemed unsure and hesitated for a moment and we walked off.

The ABC asked the Department of Parliamentary Services to clarify what the rules are on T-shirt slogans and who gets to determine what is, or is not, offensive.

The official response said Parliament has a longstanding policy to not allow offensive messages on garments within the House.

“Offensive messages may relate to a number of issues, including protest slogans, comments on murder or terrorism and those deemed to be not fitting of the decorum of the House,” a statement read.

“Given the current climate, it was considered that the message on the T-shirt could be offensive to a number of staff and visitors, which is why the individual was requested to remove the T-shirt.”

THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • Murray Smith

    Precious Political Correctness Puts Peabrain In Position Of Authority.

  • Spiker

    I’m struggling to see what’s offensive about it..

    • Ilovelife

      I think it’s the sensitivity to Islamic beheadings.

  • Clutch Cargo

    Reminds me of the newspaper headline descibing a deranged man who attacked and sexually assaulted a women hanging out her washing and then fleeing the scene…”Nut Screws Washer and Bolts”

  • WekaLegs

    Is it because it mentions the shameful concept of a topless bar, and might conjure up thoughts of boobies on display? I wonder if breastfeeding in the house results in similar tut-tutting.

  • ex-JAFA

    Some might find a woman being employed as a security guard offensive. Some might find the existence of the Australian Parliament offensive. What’s she going to do about that? Perhaps she’d suggest that people are allowed to be offended if they want to be?

  • Bryan

    that Aust Parliament entrance is armed to the teeth, no beg your pardons full machine guns at the ready i was there about 4 months ago they are firm and polite and the media as usual think they can do what they like and should have known the rules
    but once inside they are as welcoming as anyone and really worth seeing, the view from the top down to the War memorial is really stunning just as the sun sets.