Hillary Clinton’s honesty problem

Hillary Clinton got severely spanked in New Hampshire and delivered a bitter concession speech.

But now the knives are out and her claims of being bullet-proof now ring hollow.

The Washington Post talks about her “honesty problem”:

Hillary Clinton has an honesty problem.

That point is driven home hard in the exit poll following Clinton’s 22-point drubbing at the hands of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. More than one in three (34 percent) of all New Hampshire Democratic primary voters said that honesty was the most important trait in their decision on which candidate to support. Of that bloc, Sanders won 92 percent of their votes as compared to just 6 percent for Clinton.

Ninety-two to six. That is absolutely unbelievable — even given the size of Sanders’s overall victory in the state. And it should be deeply concerning to a Clinton campaign that has been resistant to acknowledging the idea that the ongoing controversy over Clinton’s private email server while at the State Department is a problem for her.

 Clinton’s standard response on questions about her honesty — or about her long-running polling problems on questions of whether she is honest and trustworthy — is that it has zero to do with her and how she has acted in and out of office but rather is the result of sustained decades of attack on her by Republicans.”Read behavioral science, read psychology,” Clinton told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow this week. “Even when all the attacks prove to be unfounded, untrue, it leaves a residue.”  She added: “There is a concerted effort to try to make partisan advantage by really trying to throw so much at me that even if little splotches of it stick, it will cloud peoples’s judgment of me. That is a burden I carry.”   

Labour here has tried to make honesty an issue with John Key. But a negative strategy like that only really works if the target politician does have a honesty problem. That is why it fails against John Key but is succeeding against Hillary Clinton.

[T]he idea that Clinton herself bears no responsibility for the fact that a majority of all Americans repeatedly tell pollsters that words like “honest” and “trustworthy” don’t apply to her is nonsensical. It was Clinton’s decision to be the first secretary of state in history to exclusively use a private email server while in office. It was Clinton who said that server would never have to be turned over to an independent investigator. (It eventually was.) It is Clinton who, time and time again, has refused to see the political damage being done to her by the questions surrounding the FBI investigation into the server.

Did Republicans work to amplify each of those mistakes? Yes — although I could argue that the 11-hour questioning of Clinton by the House Select Committee on Benghazi did the former secretary of state a lot more good than harm, politically speaking.

Amplifying slip-ups by Clinton isn’t the same thing, however, as making up the slip-ups in the first place. This isn’t all the creation of Republicans. Heck, if that were true, Democrats would rally around Clinton under the enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my-friend theory of politics. They haven’t. In fact, in New Hampshire, nine in 10 Democratic voters who said honesty was the most important thing for them in a candidate went for the other guy.

That’s the point: the list of cock-ups by Hillary Clinton is very long. She made those mistakes and no one else. It certainly wasn’t the vast right-wing conspiracy as she has claimed in the past.

Look, I get that it is hard for anyone — particularly someone who has been in public life for as long as Clinton has — to own something as fundamental as people not really believing they can trust you.

“This is not anything I want to hear because I find it so absolutely contrary to who I am,” Clinton told Maddow when asked about the perception that she is not honest.

But politics isn’t about dealing with the world as you would like it to be. It’s about dealing with the world as it is. And as New Hampshire made clear, there is a strain of concern/distrust within the Democratic base when it comes to Hillary Clinton. She needs to first acknowledge that it’s a real feeling as opposed to simply a Republican talking point. Then she has to figure out a way to begin changing that perception in the minds of Democratic primary and caucus voters.

The problem with narcissists like Hillary Clinton is that they can’t ever admit that they’ve made mistakes. It is always someone else’s fault. At least Hillary Clinton doesn’t resort to suing people for defamation when inconvenient truths appear in the political landscape. She is at least smart enough to realise that suing people, particularly media people, is a double-edged sword with no upside for the politician and plenty of downside.


– Washington Post

Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

To read Cam’s previous articles click on his name in blue.