Forget bikes; driverless vehicles are our saviour

I’ve been saying this for years and now someone else has piped up and provided a good article on why driverless technology will save us from loopy rail projects and stupid cycleways.

Ian Apperly writes at NBR:

Debate over the past two years has argued cycleways are either a good solution to traffic woes or an over-hyped solution put forward by self-interested industry groups and a left-leaning local politics environment.

The reality is that cycleways are going to vanish as is a lot of industry, as autonomous vehicles take over.

In 2010, Uber launched. It connected drivers with riders. Over the past few years Uber has been more commonly thought of as a taxi service but it is not. It’s a lot better and a lot safer.

In 2015, nearly half of all “taxi” rides in the US were Uber-driven. Uber is valued at about $50 billion, half the value of all the global taxi companies.

That new model is already “disrupting” and is set to “super-disrupt” as autonomous vehicles appear.

It’s long been known Google has a stake in Uber and that the end goal of Uber is to go driverless.

In July 2015, Uber preordered 500,000 vehicles from Tesla.

Who wants to sweat and puff to get to work?

Disruption is already here and likely to escalate, killing off moribund industries. By the time they realise and start lobbying government their businesses will have been superseded.

An autonomous vehicle, also known as a driverless car, self-driving car or robotic car, is an automated or autonomous vehicle capable of fulfilling the main transportation capabilities of a traditional car. As an autonomous vehicle, it is capable of sensing its environment and navigating without human input.

Autonomous vehicles sense their surroundings with such techniques as radar, lidar (light detection and ranging), GPS and computer vision. Advanced control systems interpret sensory information to identify appropriate navigation paths as well as obstacles and relevant signage.

By definition, autonomous vehicles are capable of updating their maps based on sensory input, allowing the vehicles to keep track of their position even when conditions change or when they enter uncharted environments .That’s according to Disruption: Emerging Technologies and the Future of Work (Kindle Edition) by Victor del Rosal.

 Uber is already killing traditional taxi companies off and New Zealand has the same complaints: Uber is not safe and taxis are better regulated and so on.

Whenever an Uber driver commits a crime, mainstream media is all over it because of its clickbait value.

But Uber’s model and the world’s move to autonomous vehicles are going to help solve some interesting problems.

About 94% of a car’s average life is spent parked. Hence the need in cities for car parks and in urban settings for garaging. There is the classic ICT capacity issue of the early 2000s, all these servers (cars) with a single application on each (a driver). Autonomous vehicles under an Uber model effectively virtualise cars.

“Sure,” I hear you say “but so do taxis.” Yep. You are bang on. But taxis have some problems that Uber solves and that autonomous vehicles nuke.

First, taxis are expensive. That’s because of the massive industry that has built up around the service. In New York, the cost of buying a taxi used to be near $US1.1 million. In New Zealand it used to be about $140,000. Post Uber, the cost of a taxi medallion in New York is closer to $600,000 and in New Zealand I hear anecdotally it has gone down to $110,000 and under. Taxis are doomed.

Taxi and Uber drivers are doomed as well. Approximately 75% of the cost of a cab, or Uber, is the driver. So translate that and a standard Uber $20 fare today becomes $5 with an autonomous vehicle.

Don’t think that will happen? Well, that is precisely what happened in media with online ads. The cost of ads online is cents in the dollar compared with charges for print ads, and the ad revenues have slumped offline as well. What has happened to media is going to happen to the taxi, automotive and transport industries.

Autonomous cars reduce the traffic count significantly. There is no longer a need to spend on more roading infrastructure other than to perhaps alter it in spots to make it easier for driverless cars to navigate. Life gets a lot easier for the cyclist.

Autonomous cars are programmed to share the road and have a lot more sensors than two human eyes. Where an aggressive human driver will provide danger to a cyclist or just make mistakes (cyclists are very hard to see), an autonomous car will not.

Futurist Zack Kanter cites a Columbia University study, which suggests that, with a fleet of only 9000 autonomous cars, Uber could replace every taxi cab in New York City. Passengers would wait an average of 36 seconds for a ride costing around 50USc a mile.

Autonomous cars will disrupt other industries as well, that like taxis, will strongly resist the move to that platform. Here are some examples:

  • Drivers are finished. From taxis to private cars, then eventually buses, trucks, trains, ships, and planes.
  • Parking is a multi-billion dollar industry. Many local governments in the western world have become addicted to the revenue stream it provides.
  • Congestion charging revenue will drop significantly.
  • Private toll road revenue take will also drop.
  • Billions of dollars of automotive insurance will plunge again as will the associated financing market and vehicle aftermarket.
  • The corner mechanic will disappear.
  • Government revenues will plunge. Registering cars, associated taxes, and other sources of income related to cars will fall.
  • Car manufacturers will lose revenue.
  • Public transport providers will go broke if they can’t adapt.

And watch the shit fight that will ensue. Buggy whip manufacturers didn’t have Twitter and Facebook to express outrage.

Globally, this is a shift in revenue of trillions of dollars and change to businesses that have been around for a century. It can be guaranteed that those groups are going to lobby governments hard to retain that business.

Autonomous cars will be vilified and their creators demonised.

For the end user, it is nirvana: cheap travel costs, even more affordable if he or she chooses to ride share, whenever they need it. Users can do whatever they wish in the car on the way to and from work within reason.

They can still retain that personal bubble they love so much. People can be sure they are having a lot less of an impact on the planet than if they owned and drove their personal car. All the hassle of owning a car is gone.

Unless industries start to adapt now, they will complain they are bleeding and then die. This is inevitable.

The industry that does not change will find themselves in the same place that global ICT companies did when the cloud started to dominate their industry.

You can choose to be a Microsoft or you can decide to be an IBM. In other words, you can choose to radically reinvent yourself or you can choose to drown slowly.

There will be a lot of gurgling sounds.

There is little point investing in cycleways when they will become redundant in the next decade. The government needs to be setting policy for this now, given the time it takes to set policy is probably about the same as the first cars arriving.

It’s going to happen, regardless, and like Uber, once the cat is out of the bag all you can do is follow. After all, how do you arrest an autonomous car?

One that always follows the road rules.

A good article from Ian Apperly.

 – NBR


Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

40%