Hillary Clinton busted in classic do as I say no as I do sting


Hillary Clinton is promoting equal pay for women as she campaigns for the nomination of the Democratic party.

But she has been busted doing the exact opposite.

The Daily Caller is reporting that male executives at the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation earn 38% more than female executives, according to a study of the foundation’s IRS tax disclosures.

The foundation’s 2013 IRS form 990 reveals that nearly three times as many men as women occupy the executive suites at the Little Rock, Arkansas-based foundation.

On average, top male executives at the foundation earn $109,000 more than the top female executives with positions in the C-suite.  

Meanwhile, on Equal Pay Day Hillary delivered a speech in Silicon Valley saying that equal pay for women was “long overdue.”

“I feel like [equal pay] is something that’s long overdue,” she said at an event organized by Glassdoor, which compares salaries and working conditions at corporations.

“It is way past time to end the outrage of so many women still earning less than men on the job,” she said in her speech.

But that’s not how her Foundation operates.

The foundation’s highest paid executive is Frederick Post, director of “sponsor and marketing,” who has built the foundation’s assets to $247 million. He received $484,000 in annual compensation.

The highest paid woman is CEO Virginia Ehrlich. Her pay is only $201,000, less than half that of Post’s.

The second-highest paid male is long-time Clinton associate Bruce Lindsay, who received $395,000 in annual compensation.

All eight male foundation execs earn $200,000 or more. Only one woman earned $200,000, while Stephanie Streett, its executive director, received a paltry $169,000.

Similarly, there are eight male executives but only three women occupying the Foundation’s executive suites.

The Foundation did not respond to a request for comment.

Typical we-know-best-do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do socialist.


– Truth Revolt


THANK YOU for being a subscriber. Because of you Whaleoil is going from strength to strength. It is a little known fact that Whaleoil subscribers are better in bed, good looking and highly intelligent. Sometimes all at once! Please Click Here Now to subscribe to an ad-free Whaleoil.

  • Orca

    Here’s an idea for Hillary, she could campaign for equal treatment of candidates in terms of the photos that are used in the media. Surely it’s not fair that Donald Trump gets all the hilarious (no pun intended) ones, while no funny ones of Hillary, such as the one above, will ever appear in the left-wing media. Surely Hillary, that is clear evidence of bias, but is it political bias, or gender bias?.

  • Ross

    It’s so hard to defend the indefensible. The CEO should be near the top of the pecking order, yet receives less than half of the top male executive. Pretty hard to explain!

    • biscuit barrel

      Thats easy, the fund raiser was on a higher income, as he probably had a big commission component.
      I think in NZ the highest paid civil servant isnt some CEO but a lowly fund manager,
      The real question would be the CEO was on a similar scale to her male predecessor
      Mike Hosking is normally paid more than the the executives who employ him, as hes the one bring who brings in the dollar. ( some have been women)
      Im staggered that the Clintons foundation employs 400 people and just as many volunteers

  • Doc45

    Tainted money in that outfit.

  • Red

    A liar, a criminal and a hypocrite walk into a bar – the barman says “Hello Madam Secretary”

  • AF

    The wage gap as currently calculated is flawed. The current calculation is the median wage with no adjustment for experience, risk to life and limb, industry, supply & demand for various roles, part versus full time and so on and so on. It is NOT an average as is so often reported and used to support a narrative. Funnily enough, when measures other than the median are used, the reported wage gap reduces. Worth thinking about and understanding….