Soper grabs Joyce by the short and curlies and tugs really hard

Barry Soper, who is having somewhat of a rejuvenation with the return of Helen Clark to our shores, has a ripper today and catches out Steve Joyce on his bullshit.

Surely it must have had something to do with it being on the eve of April Fools Day because the Minister of Catastrophes Steven Joyce was certainly taking us for one.

This multi-millionaire former employer should know better but then he is the National Party’s brains trust when it comes to the strategy used in winning elections. On that front he hasn’t done too badly but when you are in your third term, trying to win a fourth, there is surely a statute of limitations when it comes to blaming the other lot for botch ups when they were in Government.

Joyce is pointing the finger at Labour for enacting the Holidays Act way back in 2003, blaming it for short changing thousands of public servants over the years because of the complexity of the Act.

By the time you get past eight years in government it is really, really difficult to blame the previous government, though Helen Clark – Soper’s hero, did it right up until her dying days as leader.

The cops have already coughed up thirty million bucks because their pay packets haven’t been as fat as they should have been. So far they’ve uncovered around 24 thousand bureaucrats who are owed money and there are expected to be more.

So is Labour to blame? Is the man who’s been a Cabinet Minister for his entire political career, by-passing his back bench apprenticeship, justified in laying the blame at Labour’s door?

The answer is no. The Act was revisited by National in 2010 but the so called complexity wasn’t clarified which beggars the question: Why?

Well the Minister’s explanation is about as deep as a puddle, and a particularly shallow one at that.

It’s a carpark puddle Barry, a carpark puddle if you are going to use my turn of phrase.

Joyce says as soon as people say the Holidays Act should be changed, “union representatives and a number of others say don’t change it because we can’t change anybody’s entitlements at all.”

Yeah well, accept that and you’ll accept that unions don’t want their members to get their just pay desserts, and of course National’s the last party to want to get on the wrong side of the cloth caps.

The rules under the act seem pretty straight forward. Holiday pay’s either calculated on the weekly pay at the time you’re about to take your break or on the average pay you’ve received over previous year. The bosses have to pay whatever gives the worker the most money.

Trouble is some payroll computers calculate holiday pay on what’s in the letter of the worker’s contract, rather than what they’ve actually been earning.

But before you make an April fool of yourself and rush off to your paymaster demanding squillions, the biggest single payout yet is under two grand, just enough for a modest holiday.

While there is some justification in hitting Joyce for stupid comments, you could equally ask where have the unions been on this issue since 2003? Completely silent is where, as they opposed every other government initiative including the TPPA, Charter Schools and changes to Easter holidays. Looks like they are just as culpable on behalf of their members; you know, the people who pay their fees so the union can guard their hard-won rights.


– NZ Herald

Do you want:

  • Ad-free access?
  • Access to our very popular daily crossword?
  • Access to daily sudoku?
  • Access to Incite Politics magazine articles?
  • Access to podcasts?
  • Access to political polls?

Our subscribers’ financial support is the reason why we have been able to offer our latest service; Audio blogs. 

Click Here  to support us and watch the number of services grow.

As much at home writing editorials as being the subject of them, Cam has won awards, including the Canon Media Award for his work on the Len Brown/Bevan Chuang story. When he’s not creating the news, he tends to be in it, with protagonists using the courts, media and social media to deliver financial as well as death threats.

They say that news is something that someone, somewhere, wants kept quiet. Cam Slater doesn’t do quiet and, as a result, he is a polarising, controversial but highly effective journalist who takes no prisoners.

He is fearless in his pursuit of a story.

Love him or loathe him, you can’t ignore him.

To read Cam’s previous articles click on his name in blue.